Assessment of depression in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: a double-blind study

Depression commonly accompanies acute coronary syndrome (ACS), impacting up to 30% of patients and correlating with adverse outcomes. Our study aimed to assess the accuracy of clinical impression compared to the PHQ9 questionnaire for evaluating depression in ACS patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit. Screening for depression was conducted at least 48 hours from hospital admission and 24 hours following coronary angiography and PCI. The assessment was performed separately and in a blinded manner by the clinical assessment of the attending medical team and by the PHQ9 questionnaire. The study comprised 150 ACS patients with a mean age of 62 ± 13 years. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were typical for ACS patients. Based on the PHQ9 questionnaire, depressive symptoms were above the cutoff for clinical depression in 31 (20.7%) patients, with 10 (32.3%) of them experiencing moderate or severe depression (PHQ9 score >15). There were no significant differences in clinical baseline characteristics between the groups with and without clinical depression. Compared to the PHQ9 questionnaire, the medical team's assessment of depression demonstrated a reasonable specificity of 84% and low sensitivity of 32%. Negative and positive predictive values were 82.6% and 35.8%, respectively. Similar findings were observed in subgroup analyses according to gender, age, type of ACS, and history of cardiovascular disease. Depression is prevalent among ACS patients, highlighting the importance of an increased awareness of this condition. Our findings suggest that detecting clinically significant severity of depressive symptoms by the attending medical team alone may not suffice for depression assessment. Incorporating validated screening tools such as the PHQ9 questionnaire or involving psychological evaluations can enhance the accuracy of depression diagnosis in ACS patients. This multifaceted approach is crucial for ensuring comprehensive care and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Stress
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2025.2461163
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of depression in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: a double-blind study

Sapir Tzadok, Ziad Arow, Ela Giladi, Abid Assali et al.
2 citations
Stress
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
2.78
article

Assessment of depression in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome: a double-blind study

Sapir Tzadok, Ziad Arow, Ela Giladi, Abid Assali, Ilya Losin, David Pereg, Yoav Arnson, Sharon Reisfeld, Ranin Hilu, Tamar Shitrit
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Depression commonly accompanies acute coronary syndrome (ACS), impacting up to 30% of patients and correlating with adverse outcomes. Our study aimed to assess the accuracy of clinical impression compared to the PHQ9 questionnaire for evaluating depression in ACS patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit. Screening for depression was conducted at least 48 hours from hospital admission and 24 hours following coronary angiography and PCI. The assessment was performed separately and in a blinded manner by the clinical assessment of the attending medical team and by the PHQ9 questionnaire. The study comprised 150 ACS patients with a mean age of 62 ± 13 years. Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were typical for ACS patients. Based on the PHQ9 questionnaire, depressive symptoms were above the cutoff for clinical depression in 31 (20.7%) patients, with 10 (32.3%) of them experiencing moderate or severe depression (PHQ9 score >15). There were no significant differences in clinical baseline characteristics between the groups with and without clinical depression. Compared to the PHQ9 questionnaire, the medical team's assessment of depression demonstrated a reasonable specificity of 84% and low sensitivity of 32%. Negative and positive predictive values were 82.6% and 35.8%, respectively. Similar findings were observed in subgroup analyses according to gender, age, type of ACS, and history of cardiovascular disease. Depression is prevalent among ACS patients, highlighting the importance of an increased awareness of this condition. Our findings suggest that detecting clinically significant severity of depressive symptoms by the attending medical team alone may not suffice for depression assessment. Incorporating validated screening tools such as the PHQ9 questionnaire or involving psychological evaluations can enhance the accuracy of depression diagnosis in ACS patients. This multifaceted approach is crucial for ensuring comprehensive care and improving patient outcomes.

StressVol. 28(1)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Meir Medical Center (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.