Plus Ça Change: The Politics of Alterity, and Italian and Maltese Responses to Recent Migration Challenges

This article analyzes the evolving refugee related policies of Italy and Malta in recent years by employing Hannah Arendt’s insights into the origins of refugee status and the power of alterity as an animating force of human behavior. We contend that both these countries have circumvented European Union and United Nations compacts and rules governing refugee treatment during this difficult historical era and that their behavior, and that of their populations, provides a powerful and salient reminder of the challenge of ensuring displaced people rights in the face of human willingness to ‘other.’ We argue too that the bases of those obstacles take multiple forms including deliberate appeals to hatreds, fears, and grievances, real and imagined, by political leaders for purposes of securing power, as well as via perversions of national memory and history. More deeply, the wellsprings of the behaviors to which Arendt pointed lie in individuals’ innate relative incapacity to tolerate difference, presenting a critical ongoing challenge for democratic governance amidst conditions of pluralism of whatever stripe. Keywords: refugees, Syrian Civil War, Hannah Arendt, Italy, Malta, alterity

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Athens Journal of Politics & International Affair
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30958/ajpia.1-2-1
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plus Ça Change: The Politics of Alterity, and Italian and Maltese Responses to Recent Migration Challenges

Max Stephenson, Neda Moayerian
Athens Journal of Politics & International Affair
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Plus Ça Change: The Politics of Alterity, and Italian and Maltese Responses to Recent Migration Challenges

Max Stephenson, Neda Moayerian
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the evolving refugee related policies of Italy and Malta in recent years by employing Hannah Arendt’s insights into the origins of refugee status and the power of alterity as an animating force of human behavior. We contend that both these countries have circumvented European Union and United Nations compacts and rules governing refugee treatment during this difficult historical era and that their behavior, and that of their populations, provides a powerful and salient reminder of the challenge of ensuring displaced people rights in the face of human willingness to ‘other.’ We argue too that the bases of those obstacles take multiple forms including deliberate appeals to hatreds, fears, and grievances, real and imagined, by political leaders for purposes of securing power, as well as via perversions of national memory and history. More deeply, the wellsprings of the behaviors to which Arendt pointed lie in individuals’ innate relative incapacity to tolerate difference, presenting a critical ongoing challenge for democratic governance amidst conditions of pluralism of whatever stripe. Keywords: refugees, Syrian Civil War, Hannah Arendt, Italy, Malta, alterity

Athens Journal of Politics & International AffairVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Plus Ça Change: The Politics of Alterity, and Italian and Maltese Responses to Recent Migration Challenges — Max Stephenson, Neda Moayerian · Athens Journal of Politics & International Affair (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS