Analysis of density matrix embedding theory around the non‐interacting limit

Abstract This article provides the first mathematical analysis of the Density Matrix Embedding Theory (DMET) method. We prove that, under certain assumptions, (i) the exact ground‐state density matrix is a fixed‐point of the DMET map for non‐interacting systems, (ii) there exists a unique physical solution in the weakly‐interacting regime, and (iii) DMET is exact up to first order in the coupling parameter. We provide numerical simulations to support our results and comment on the physical meaning of the assumptions under which they hold true. We show that the violation of these assumptions may yield multiple solutions to the DMET equations. We moreover introduce and discuss a specific ‐representability problem inherent to DMET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.22244
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of density matrix embedding theory around the non‐interacting limit

Eloïse Letournel, Alfred Kirsch, Fabian M. Faulstich, Éric Cancès et al.
1 citations
Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
1.26
article

Analysis of density matrix embedding theory around the non‐interacting limit

Eloïse Letournel, Alfred Kirsch, Fabian M. Faulstich, Éric Cancès, Antoine Levitt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article provides the first mathematical analysis of the Density Matrix Embedding Theory (DMET) method. We prove that, under certain assumptions, (i) the exact ground‐state density matrix is a fixed‐point of the DMET map for non‐interacting systems, (ii) there exists a unique physical solution in the weakly‐interacting regime, and (iii) DMET is exact up to first order in the coupling parameter. We provide numerical simulations to support our results and comment on the physical meaning of the assumptions under which they hold true. We show that the violation of these assumptions may yield multiple solutions to the DMET equations. We moreover introduce and discuss a specific ‐representability problem inherent to DMET.

Communications on Pure and Applied MathematicsVol. 78(8)
École nationale des ponts et chaussées (FR), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Laboratoire de Mathématiques d'Orsay (FR), CERMICS (FR)
Horizon 2020, Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.