Conceptualizing Professional Stigma Toward Forensic Mental Health Service Users: Results of a Qualitative Inquiry

Forensic service users may face double stigma due to severe mental illness and a history of criminal offending. Professional stigma, involving stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors among mental healthcare professionals, can impede treatment and rehabilitation. Research on professional stigma, particularly toward forensic service users, is scarce. We explore relevant concepts of professional stigma using a Delphi consensus study and focus group. The Delphi study involved 98 experts across five panels (academics publishing about stigma or forensic mental healthcare, forensic and community mental healthcare professionals, and forensic service users), who evaluated the relevance of 85 stigma-related items on a 7-point Likert-scale. Consensus was reached on 26 items, including stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination, reflecting dangerousness, fear, recovery potential, and restrictions. The focus group, involving seven forensic service users, yielded experiences with professional stigma, including recovery pessimism, perceived dangerousness, devaluation through offenses, dismissive reactions, differential treatment, intrusive behavior, and restrictions. Our findings highlight the complexity of conceptualizing professional stigma and provide a foundation for developing an instrument to assess it. Future research will evaluate the psychometric properties of this instrument, which is essential for identifying and addressing stigma in forensic and community mental healthcare, ultimately improving care and rehabilitation outcomes for forensic service users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14999013251314894
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptualizing Professional Stigma Toward Forensic Mental Health Service Users: Results of a Qualitative Inquiry

Gemma Escuder-Romeva, Ellen Vorstenbosch, Erik H. Bulten, Josep Maria Haro
5 citations
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Mental Health Treatment and Access
12.19
article

Conceptualizing Professional Stigma Toward Forensic Mental Health Service Users: Results of a Qualitative Inquiry

Gemma Escuder-Romeva, Ellen Vorstenbosch, Erik H. Bulten, Josep Maria Haro
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Forensic service users may face double stigma due to severe mental illness and a history of criminal offending. Professional stigma, involving stigmatizing attitudes and behaviors among mental healthcare professionals, can impede treatment and rehabilitation. Research on professional stigma, particularly toward forensic service users, is scarce. We explore relevant concepts of professional stigma using a Delphi consensus study and focus group. The Delphi study involved 98 experts across five panels (academics publishing about stigma or forensic mental healthcare, forensic and community mental healthcare professionals, and forensic service users), who evaluated the relevance of 85 stigma-related items on a 7-point Likert-scale. Consensus was reached on 26 items, including stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination, reflecting dangerousness, fear, recovery potential, and restrictions. The focus group, involving seven forensic service users, yielded experiences with professional stigma, including recovery pessimism, perceived dangerousness, devaluation through offenses, dismissive reactions, differential treatment, intrusive behavior, and restrictions. Our findings highlight the complexity of conceptualizing professional stigma and provide a foundation for developing an instrument to assess it. Future research will evaluate the psychometric properties of this instrument, which is essential for identifying and addressing stigma in forensic and community mental healthcare, ultimately improving care and rehabilitation outcomes for forensic service users.

International Journal of Forensic Mental HealthVol. 24(4)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), Sant Joan de Déu Research Foundation (ES), Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu (ES), Swiss Paraplegic Research (CH), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
12.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.