The Role of Drone’s Digital Facial Emotions and Gaze in Shaping Individuals’ Social Proxemics and Interpretation

The potential for drones to engage with people and find applications in social contexts is often constrained by their mechanical design, leading to concerns and negative associations that significantly affect people’s acceptance of drones in their personal space. In this study, we explore how social cues can impact the spatial dynamic of Human–Drone Interaction. Within a fully immersive virtual environment, 25 participants engaged with and navigated around a drone that communicated several facial emotions on a digital display such as Joy, Sadness and Anger, and enacted distinct “gaze” behaviors (i.e., following participants or averting its gaze). Our results indicate that participants responded to the drone’s gaze in a manner akin to what is reported during human interaction: maintaining a greater distance when the drone established eye contact and instinctively getting closer when it averted its gaze. A more granular analysis revealed that participants who lacked prior familiarity with drones or possessed neutral to positive attitudes toward them demonstrated a higher sensitivity to the drone’s digital facial emotions. This finding highlights the potential for leveraging social cues to facilitate the integration of drones into various human-centric environments and tailor their design and behavior to suit specific individuals and situations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3714477
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Drone’s Digital Facial Emotions and Gaze in Shaping Individuals’ Social Proxemics and Interpretation

Mohamed Khamis, Mohammad Obaid, Emily S. Cross, Robin Bretin
9 citations
ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
Face Recognition and Perception
12.88
article

The Role of Drone’s Digital Facial Emotions and Gaze in Shaping Individuals’ Social Proxemics and Interpretation

Mohamed Khamis, Mohammad Obaid, Emily S. Cross, Robin Bretin
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The potential for drones to engage with people and find applications in social contexts is often constrained by their mechanical design, leading to concerns and negative associations that significantly affect people’s acceptance of drones in their personal space. In this study, we explore how social cues can impact the spatial dynamic of Human–Drone Interaction. Within a fully immersive virtual environment, 25 participants engaged with and navigated around a drone that communicated several facial emotions on a digital display such as Joy, Sadness and Anger, and enacted distinct “gaze” behaviors (i.e., following participants or averting its gaze). Our results indicate that participants responded to the drone’s gaze in a manner akin to what is reported during human interaction: maintaining a greater distance when the drone established eye contact and instinctively getting closer when it averted its gaze. A more granular analysis revealed that participants who lacked prior familiarity with drones or possessed neutral to positive attitudes toward them demonstrated a higher sensitivity to the drone’s digital facial emotions. This finding highlights the potential for leveraging social cues to facilitate the integration of drones into various human-centric environments and tailor their design and behavior to suit specific individuals and situations.

ACM Transactions on Human-Robot InteractionVol. 14(3)
ETH Zurich (CH), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Face Recognition and Perception
12.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.