Learning-based estimation of cattle weight gain and its influencing factors

• Review CWG studies (2005–2024) to identify trends and gaps in weight estimation. • Evaluate ML tools for estimating CWG improving cattle weight gain strategies. • Explore several primary factors that impact CWG. • Identify the significance of mob-based CWG prediction approaches in past research. Many cattle farmers still depend on manual methods to measure the live weight gain of cattle at set intervals, which is time-consuming, labour-intensive, and stressful for both the animals and handlers. A remote and autonomous monitoring system using machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) can provide a more efficient and less invasive method and also predictive capabilities for future cattle weight gain (CWG). This system allows continuous monitoring and estimation of individual cattle’s live weight gain, growth rates and weight fluctuations considering various factors like environmental conditions, genetic predispositions, feed availability, movement patterns and behaviour. Several researchers have explored the efficiency of estimating CWG using ML and DL algorithms. However, estimating CWG suffers from a lack of consistency in its application. Moreover, ML or DL can provide weight gain estimations based on several features that vary in existing research. Additionally, previous studies have encountered various data-related challenges when estimating CWG. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation in estimating CWG using advanced ML techniques based on research articles (2004–2024). This study investigates the current tools, methods, and features used in CWG estimation, as well as their strengths and weaknesses. The findings highlight the significance of using advanced ML approaches in CWG estimation and its critical influence on factors. Furthermore, this study identifies potential research gaps and provides research direction on CWG prediction, which serves as a reference for future research in this area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110033
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning-based estimation of cattle weight gain and its influencing factors

Shawn McGrath, David Lamb, Md Zahidul Islam, Muhammad Riaz Hasib Hossain et al.
5 citations
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
9.09
article

Learning-based estimation of cattle weight gain and its influencing factors

Shawn McGrath, David Lamb, Md Zahidul Islam, Muhammad Riaz Hasib Hossain, Md. Rafiqul Islam
article en
5 citations

Abstract

• Review CWG studies (2005–2024) to identify trends and gaps in weight estimation. • Evaluate ML tools for estimating CWG improving cattle weight gain strategies. • Explore several primary factors that impact CWG. • Identify the significance of mob-based CWG prediction approaches in past research. Many cattle farmers still depend on manual methods to measure the live weight gain of cattle at set intervals, which is time-consuming, labour-intensive, and stressful for both the animals and handlers. A remote and autonomous monitoring system using machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) can provide a more efficient and less invasive method and also predictive capabilities for future cattle weight gain (CWG). This system allows continuous monitoring and estimation of individual cattle’s live weight gain, growth rates and weight fluctuations considering various factors like environmental conditions, genetic predispositions, feed availability, movement patterns and behaviour. Several researchers have explored the efficiency of estimating CWG using ML and DL algorithms. However, estimating CWG suffers from a lack of consistency in its application. Moreover, ML or DL can provide weight gain estimations based on several features that vary in existing research. Additionally, previous studies have encountered various data-related challenges when estimating CWG. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation in estimating CWG using advanced ML techniques based on research articles (2004–2024). This study investigates the current tools, methods, and features used in CWG estimation, as well as their strengths and weaknesses. The findings highlight the significance of using advanced ML approaches in CWG estimation and its critical influence on factors. Furthermore, this study identifies potential research gaps and provides research direction on CWG prediction, which serves as a reference for future research in this area.

Computers and Electronics in AgricultureVol. 231
Charles Sturt University (AU), University of New England (AU)
Australian Government, Charles Sturt University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
9.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.