Linguistic hegemony in academia

Abstract This research paper addresses the complex interplay between multilingualism and the pervasive dominance of the English language in academic publishing, particularly focusing on Arabic academic publications in the humanities. This study adopts a comprehensive research methodology, employing both qualitative and quantitative analyses to investigate Arabic research representation in English-dominated academic journals, particularly those indexed in Scopus across various humanities disciplines such as Language and Linguistics, Literature, Islamic Studies, and Translation. The analysis utilizes bibliometric data from Scopus, focusing on publications from 1970 to 2023 that feature “Arabic,” “Arab,” or “Islamic” in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. The results indicate a significant underrepresentation of Arabic scholarship, with English accounting for 85% of publications and Arabic barely reaching 1.1%. The discrepancies in publication trends are obvious, on the levels of countries, author affiliations as well as language of publication. Overall, the results highlight the hegemonic nature of academic publishing, the marginalization of valuable Arabic research and the challenges Arabic-speaking scholars face in gaining recognition. Finally, the study addresses the broader implications of linguistic dominance on global knowledge production and advocates for a more inclusive scholarly landscape that values linguistic diversity through specific recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Problems & Language Planning
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.24014.all
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic hegemony in academia

Boutheina Khaldi, Meis Al-Kaisi, Ahmed Allaithy, Mai Zaki
2 citations
Language Problems & Language Planning
Second Language Learning and Teaching
7.82
article

Linguistic hegemony in academia

Boutheina Khaldi, Meis Al-Kaisi, Ahmed Allaithy, Mai Zaki
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This research paper addresses the complex interplay between multilingualism and the pervasive dominance of the English language in academic publishing, particularly focusing on Arabic academic publications in the humanities. This study adopts a comprehensive research methodology, employing both qualitative and quantitative analyses to investigate Arabic research representation in English-dominated academic journals, particularly those indexed in Scopus across various humanities disciplines such as Language and Linguistics, Literature, Islamic Studies, and Translation. The analysis utilizes bibliometric data from Scopus, focusing on publications from 1970 to 2023 that feature “Arabic,” “Arab,” or “Islamic” in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. The results indicate a significant underrepresentation of Arabic scholarship, with English accounting for 85% of publications and Arabic barely reaching 1.1%. The discrepancies in publication trends are obvious, on the levels of countries, author affiliations as well as language of publication. Overall, the results highlight the hegemonic nature of academic publishing, the marginalization of valuable Arabic research and the challenges Arabic-speaking scholars face in gaining recognition. Finally, the study addresses the broader implications of linguistic dominance on global knowledge production and advocates for a more inclusive scholarly landscape that values linguistic diversity through specific recommendations.

Language Problems & Language PlanningVol. 48(3)
American University of Sharjah (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.