Maleic Anhydride‐Based Polymeric Pour Point Depressants for Crude Oils: Select the Right Additive to Save Energy

Abstract Modifying the wax crystal habit is useful for transporting and processing crude oil at low temperatures. Various polymeric pour point depressant (PPD) additives can aid in this maneuver differently. Various morphologies of polymeric additives (like comb, brush, centipede, etc.,) have been shown to lower the pour point of crude oil by providing several nucleation sites for wax precipitation. Out of the large array of materials available, it is challenging to forecast which one will act as a wax‐crystal modifier on the crude oil under consideration. We propose, in this study, a detailed classification of wax‐crystal modifier additives based on criteria such as linear or branched copolymers, the presence of crystalline or amorphous segments, aromatic units and their positions (such as in the backbone or branch), the ability to self‐assemble or aggregate, etc. Accordingly, we synthesized additives from the maleic anhydride class having three different morphologies namely brush, combs, and centipedes, through free radical polymerization (FRP). The detailed characterization of these additives was carried out using structure‐sensitive techniques, such as 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and gel permeation chromatography. To evaluate the real‐time performance of the as‐synthesized additives, we selected crude oils from the South Kadi (SK), Limbodara (LM), and Nada (ND) oil fields of the Cambay basin, Gujarat, India having different levels of wax and asphaltenes. The rheological parameters of crude (with and without additive) were investigated using an Advance Rheometer AR‐500. Depending on the additive capability to self‐aggregate and the composition of the crude oil, the additive AMI‐3 is the most effective for ND, EST‐2 for LM, and A‐18S for SK crude oils. Their 1000 ppm dose can reduce the pour point of these crudes up to 18 °C and improve their rheological parameters accordingly. Finally, we propose the mechanisms of pour point depression by these as‐synthesized additives and carry out the microscopic imaging of the precipitated wax crystals from the blank and additive‐treated crude oil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemistrySelect
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202404604
Primary Topic
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maleic Anhydride‐Based Polymeric Pour Point Depressants for Crude Oils: Select the Right Additive to Save Energy

Hemant P. Soni, Shrish G. Wagh, Kiranbala Dahiya, Sudhirkumar S. Katariya
ChemistrySelect
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
article

Maleic Anhydride‐Based Polymeric Pour Point Depressants for Crude Oils: Select the Right Additive to Save Energy

Hemant P. Soni, Shrish G. Wagh, Kiranbala Dahiya, Sudhirkumar S. Katariya
article en

Abstract

Abstract Modifying the wax crystal habit is useful for transporting and processing crude oil at low temperatures. Various polymeric pour point depressant (PPD) additives can aid in this maneuver differently. Various morphologies of polymeric additives (like comb, brush, centipede, etc.,) have been shown to lower the pour point of crude oil by providing several nucleation sites for wax precipitation. Out of the large array of materials available, it is challenging to forecast which one will act as a wax‐crystal modifier on the crude oil under consideration. We propose, in this study, a detailed classification of wax‐crystal modifier additives based on criteria such as linear or branched copolymers, the presence of crystalline or amorphous segments, aromatic units and their positions (such as in the backbone or branch), the ability to self‐assemble or aggregate, etc. Accordingly, we synthesized additives from the maleic anhydride class having three different morphologies namely brush, combs, and centipedes, through free radical polymerization (FRP). The detailed characterization of these additives was carried out using structure‐sensitive techniques, such as 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and gel permeation chromatography. To evaluate the real‐time performance of the as‐synthesized additives, we selected crude oils from the South Kadi (SK), Limbodara (LM), and Nada (ND) oil fields of the Cambay basin, Gujarat, India having different levels of wax and asphaltenes. The rheological parameters of crude (with and without additive) were investigated using an Advance Rheometer AR‐500. Depending on the additive capability to self‐aggregate and the composition of the crude oil, the additive AMI‐3 is the most effective for ND, EST‐2 for LM, and A‐18S for SK crude oils. Their 1000 ppm dose can reduce the pour point of these crudes up to 18 °C and improve their rheological parameters accordingly. Finally, we propose the mechanisms of pour point depression by these as‐synthesized additives and carry out the microscopic imaging of the precipitated wax crystals from the blank and additive‐treated crude oil.

ChemistrySelectVol. 10(5)
Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda (IN), Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (India) (IN)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Petroleum Processing and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.