The EDPB 01/2025 Guidelines on Pseudonymisation: A Step in the Right Direction?

This post reviews EDPB 01/2025 Guidelines on Pseudonymisation. It stresses the importance of the pseudonymisation domain for risk assessment and highlights a few definitional inconsistencies. It also shows how the Guidelines can be read in the light of recent CJEU case law.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/9885764c.3d9978a3
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The EDPB 01/2025 Guidelines on Pseudonymisation: A Step in the Right Direction?

Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
European and International Law Studies
article

The EDPB 01/2025 Guidelines on Pseudonymisation: A Step in the Right Direction?

Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
article en

Abstract

This post reviews EDPB 01/2025 Guidelines on Pseudonymisation. It stresses the importance of the pseudonymisation domain for risk assessment and highlights a few definitional inconsistencies. It also shows how the Guidelines can be read in the light of recent CJEU case law.

Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
European and International Law Studies
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The EDPB 01/2025 Guidelines on Pseudonymisation: A Step in the Right Direction? — Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS