Family-Level Impact of Germline Genetic Testing in Childhood Cancer: A Multi Family Member Interview Analysis

<b>Objectives:</b> Germline genetic testing is increasingly being integrated into pediatric oncology and a large number of families are interested. Current research on the psychological impact of germline genetic testing is limited by a main focus on individual outcomes in parents or children and little is known about its impact at the family level. Our study addresses that limitation by exploring parents' lived experiences of how their family-as a whole-is affected by germline genetic testing for cancer predisposition. <b>Methods:</b> In six families who opted for germline genetic testing in the context of cancer predisposition, both parents of six ill children (five boys) with an average age of 9.67 years (SD = 3.77 years) were interviewed individually (N = 12). Germline genetic testing was performed by exome sequencing followed by analysis of a panel of childhood cancer predisposition genes in pediatric cancer patients and their parents. Their experiences were elicited through semi-structured interviews and the data were analyzed using Multi Family Member Interview Analysis. This qualitative study was conducted at Ghent University Hospital in Belgium. <b>Results:</b> The findings demonstrated that while germline genetic testing was generally viewed as a valuable and straightforward step in the child's oncology trajectory, parents found it difficult to distinguish its impact from the overwhelming stressors of their child's cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, parents recognized that the testing also significantly affected various family-level processes. Five main themes were identified: talking about germline genetic testing, being together matters (more), differences in coping with germline genetic testing between partners, feelings of guilt and mutual forgiveness, and concerns about the future health of the family. <b>Conclusions:</b> Given the expanded use of germline genetic testing in pediatric oncology, it is critical for clinicians to address the family-level impacts of germline genetic testing. Although families are affected by these issues, they often do not raise them due to the overwhelming challenges posed by the cancer diagnosis and treatment. Proactively addressing these themes could improve the support provided to families undergoing germline genetic testing for cancer predisposition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030517
Citations
6
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Family-Level Impact of Germline Genetic Testing in Childhood Cancer: A Multi Family Member Interview Analysis

Marieke Van Schoors, Claire Elizabeth Wakefield, Mario Van Poucke, Kathleen Claes et al.
6 citations
Cancers
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
10.90
article

Family-Level Impact of Germline Genetic Testing in Childhood Cancer: A Multi Family Member Interview Analysis

Marieke Van Schoors, Claire Elizabeth Wakefield, Mario Van Poucke, Kathleen Claes, Lesley Verhofstadt, Robin De Putter, Sabine Hellemans, Sophie Van Hoyweghen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> Germline genetic testing is increasingly being integrated into pediatric oncology and a large number of families are interested. Current research on the psychological impact of germline genetic testing is limited by a main focus on individual outcomes in parents or children and little is known about its impact at the family level. Our study addresses that limitation by exploring parents' lived experiences of how their family-as a whole-is affected by germline genetic testing for cancer predisposition. <b>Methods:</b> In six families who opted for germline genetic testing in the context of cancer predisposition, both parents of six ill children (five boys) with an average age of 9.67 years (SD = 3.77 years) were interviewed individually (N = 12). Germline genetic testing was performed by exome sequencing followed by analysis of a panel of childhood cancer predisposition genes in pediatric cancer patients and their parents. Their experiences were elicited through semi-structured interviews and the data were analyzed using Multi Family Member Interview Analysis. This qualitative study was conducted at Ghent University Hospital in Belgium. <b>Results:</b> The findings demonstrated that while germline genetic testing was generally viewed as a valuable and straightforward step in the child's oncology trajectory, parents found it difficult to distinguish its impact from the overwhelming stressors of their child's cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, parents recognized that the testing also significantly affected various family-level processes. Five main themes were identified: talking about germline genetic testing, being together matters (more), differences in coping with germline genetic testing between partners, feelings of guilt and mutual forgiveness, and concerns about the future health of the family. <b>Conclusions:</b> Given the expanded use of germline genetic testing in pediatric oncology, it is critical for clinicians to address the family-level impacts of germline genetic testing. Although families are affected by these issues, they often do not raise them due to the overwhelming challenges posed by the cancer diagnosis and treatment. Proactively addressing these themes could improve the support provided to families undergoing germline genetic testing for cancer predisposition.

CancersVol. 17(3)
Ghent University Hospital (BE), UNSW Sydney (AU), Ghent University (BE), Vlaams Patiëntenplatform (BE), Cancer Research Institute Ghent (BE), Sydney Children's Hospital (AU)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
10.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.