Hypereides: Verteidigungsrede für Euxenippos gegen Polyeuktos wegen Landesverrats– Zur Frage der Datierung

Abstract Hypereides' In defence of Euxenippus against Polyeuctus upon his indictment for treason was dated by its first editor Churchill Babington to the year 334 BC, while the second editor, Domenico Comparetti, places the possible date of composition almost ten years later, to the period between 330 and 324 BC. According to Comparetti, the orator could only have quoted the expression ‘Molossia is mine’ from the letter of Alexander's mother Olympias to the Athenian people at the time when Olympias was already ruler of the territory in question, i.e. after the death of her brother in 331 BC. This date has been accepted as the factual date of composition for over 150 years, so editors have adapted several emendations and alternative interpretations to this view. This study argues that the speech should be dated to 334/333 BC according to the surviving, clearly interpretable text and that any emendations are therefore superfluous – Churchill Babington was right.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1556/068.2024.00161
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypereides: Verteidigungsrede für Euxenippos gegen Polyeuktos wegen Landesverrats– Zur Frage der Datierung

László Horváth
1 citations
Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
8.27
article

Hypereides: Verteidigungsrede für Euxenippos gegen Polyeuktos wegen Landesverrats– Zur Frage der Datierung

László Horváth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Hypereides' In defence of Euxenippus against Polyeuctus upon his indictment for treason was dated by its first editor Churchill Babington to the year 334 BC, while the second editor, Domenico Comparetti, places the possible date of composition almost ten years later, to the period between 330 and 324 BC. According to Comparetti, the orator could only have quoted the expression ‘Molossia is mine’ from the letter of Alexander's mother Olympias to the Athenian people at the time when Olympias was already ruler of the territory in question, i.e. after the death of her brother in 331 BC. This date has been accepted as the factual date of composition for over 150 years, so editors have adapted several emendations and alternative interpretations to this view. This study argues that the speech should be dated to 334/333 BC according to the surviving, clearly interpretable text and that any emendations are therefore superfluous – Churchill Babington was right.

Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum HungaricaeVol. 64(3-4)
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hypereides: Verteidigungsrede für Euxenippos gegen Polyeuktos wegen Landesverrats– Zur Frage der Datierung — László Horváth · Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS