Navigating Uncertainty: A User-Perspective Survey of Trustworthiness of AI in Healthcare

This article offers an extensive survey of one of the fundamental aspects of the trustworthiness of AI in healthcare, namely uncertainty, focusing on the large panoply of recent studies addressing the connection between uncertainty, AI, and healthcare. The concept of uncertainty is a recurring theme across multiple disciplines, with varying focuses and approaches. Here, we focus on the diverse nature of uncertainty in medical applications, emphasizing the importance of quantifying uncertainty in model predictions and its advantages in specific clinical settings. Questions that emerge in this context range from the guidelines for AI integration in the healthcare domain to the ethical deliberations and their compatibility with cutting-edge AI research. Together with a description of the main specific works in this context, we also discuss that, as medicine evolves and introduces novel sources of uncertainty, there is a need for more versatile uncertainty quantification methods to be developed collaboratively by researchers and healthcare professionals. Finally, we acknowledge the limitations of current uncertainty quantification methods in addressing the different facets of uncertainty within the medical domain. In particular, we identify from this survey a relative paucity of approaches that focus on the user’s perception of uncertainty and accordingly of trustworthiness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3716317
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Uncertainty: A User-Perspective Survey of Trustworthiness of AI in Healthcare

Jaya Ojha, Pedro G. Lind, Anis Yazidi, Éric Monteiro et al.
11 citations
ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
7.20
article

Navigating Uncertainty: A User-Perspective Survey of Trustworthiness of AI in Healthcare

Jaya Ojha, Pedro G. Lind, Anis Yazidi, Éric Monteiro, Oriana Presacan
article en
11 citations

Abstract

This article offers an extensive survey of one of the fundamental aspects of the trustworthiness of AI in healthcare, namely uncertainty, focusing on the large panoply of recent studies addressing the connection between uncertainty, AI, and healthcare. The concept of uncertainty is a recurring theme across multiple disciplines, with varying focuses and approaches. Here, we focus on the diverse nature of uncertainty in medical applications, emphasizing the importance of quantifying uncertainty in model predictions and its advantages in specific clinical settings. Questions that emerge in this context range from the guidelines for AI integration in the healthcare domain to the ethical deliberations and their compatibility with cutting-edge AI research. Together with a description of the main specific works in this context, we also discuss that, as medicine evolves and introduces novel sources of uncertainty, there is a need for more versatile uncertainty quantification methods to be developed collaboratively by researchers and healthcare professionals. Finally, we acknowledge the limitations of current uncertainty quantification methods in addressing the different facets of uncertainty within the medical domain. In particular, we identify from this survey a relative paucity of approaches that focus on the user’s perception of uncertainty and accordingly of trustworthiness.

ACM Transactions on Computing for HealthcareVol. 6(3)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Simula Research Laboratory (NO), Metropolitan University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
7.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.