Health and social care use, costs, and satisfaction among key workers accessing Resilience Hub support during the COVID-19 pandemic
Key workers are vulnerable to adverse mental health. To ensure service sustainability during COVID-19, Resilience Hubs were established across England offering outreach, screening, and mental health support. This evaluation aimed to describe wider service use, associated costs, and satisfaction among Hub clients (key workers) accessing Hub support. Clients accessing support across four Hubs were invited to complete a service use questionnaire, between 5 and 8 months post referral, collecting satisfaction, wider service use and cost data. Exploratory linear regression assessed the relationship between demographic variables and service use. Most Hub clients reported Hub contact post referral (219/299, 73.2%), with many accessing mental health support (171/299, 57.2%) or on waitlists (34/299, 11.4%). Satisfaction was high, with median helpfulness rated 92 (out of 100), and many stating that Hubs either fully (148/299, 49.5%) or partially (54/299, 18.1%) met their needs. Mental health support accounted for most service use, with higher total service use and costs when including Hub services (£514 versus £213). Key workers have complex needs. Hub services helped clients to access support, with high reported satisfaction indicating that Hubs met clients needs. Further research is required to assess how service use varies according to occupation or demographic characteristics, and whether Hubs are clinically and cost-effective.
Authors
- Joanne Jordan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3308-9104)
- Holly Walker
- Kate Allsopp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5093-0404)
- Ruth Watson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-1426)
- Aleix Rowlandson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9513-7821)
- Filippo Varese (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7244-598X)
- Lesley‐Anne Carter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1193-8681)
- Fay Huntley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-4368)
- Hein Ten Cate
- Daniel Hind (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-4793)
- May Sarsam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0506-0227)
- Jack Wilkinson
- Linda Davies (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8801-3559)
- Paul French (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4300-387X)
- Alan Barrett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-2528)
- Gemma Shields (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4869-7524)
- Gita Bhutani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2732-6479)
- Katherine McGuirk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-7820)
- Jenni Willbourn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4965-4123)
Institutions
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- West Park Hospital (GB)
- Mersey Care NHS Trust (GB)
- Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Salford (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2025-02-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12066-w
- Primary Topic
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Health and Social Care Delivery Research