A novel approach to rapidly tracking whole-farm methane emissions

Abstract Enteric fermentation and manure from livestock farming are major sources of methane (CH 4 ) emissions and have a large potential for emissions reduction. However, there is a lack of effective methods for evaluating future emissions reduction efforts, especially at the farm scale. We developed a rapid analysis method to evaluate CH 4 emissions from a large number of dairy cow farms in the Netherlands based on single-transect mobile van measurements of CH 4 concentrations downwind of farms located between 80 and 750 m from the road. Methane emissions from 51 dairy cow farms were determined on four campaign days within a total of 7 measurement hours between November 2017 and November 2018 using an inverse Gaussian approach combined with two different wind datasets and their composite. We found a range of moderate to high correlation ( R 2 : minimum 0.42, maximum 0.86) between the estimated CH 4 emission rates for 11–16 farms on each measurement day and the number of animal units (AUs, 1 AU equals 500 kg of animal weight) across four individual days. The whole-farm CH 4 emission factors (including both enteric fermentation and manure) for the four separate campaign days were estimated using the slope between the CH 4 emission rates derived from the composite of two distinct wind datasets and the number of AUs. Daily emission factors for the four campaign days were estimated to be in the range of 0.18–0.50 kgCH 4 /d/AU. From the dataset, averaged over each of the four campaign days, we derived an estimate of the whole-farm CH 4 emission factor, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.47 [0.13–0.81] kgCH 4 /d/AU. Our results demonstrate that CH 4 emissions from a large number of dairy cow farms can be rapidly estimated, providing an independent way to evaluate country-specific emission factors and a potential way to monitor future emission reductions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adb1f6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel approach to rapidly tracking whole-farm methane emissions

Katarina Vinković, Huilin Chen, Pim van den Bulk, Theo van der Zee et al.
1 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

A novel approach to rapidly tracking whole-farm methane emissions

Katarina Vinković, Huilin Chen, Pim van den Bulk, Theo van der Zee, A. Hensen, Ilona Velzeboer, Wouter Peters, Hugo Denier van der Gon, M.C. van Zanten, Chu Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Enteric fermentation and manure from livestock farming are major sources of methane (CH 4 ) emissions and have a large potential for emissions reduction. However, there is a lack of effective methods for evaluating future emissions reduction efforts, especially at the farm scale. We developed a rapid analysis method to evaluate CH 4 emissions from a large number of dairy cow farms in the Netherlands based on single-transect mobile van measurements of CH 4 concentrations downwind of farms located between 80 and 750 m from the road. Methane emissions from 51 dairy cow farms were determined on four campaign days within a total of 7 measurement hours between November 2017 and November 2018 using an inverse Gaussian approach combined with two different wind datasets and their composite. We found a range of moderate to high correlation ( R 2 : minimum 0.42, maximum 0.86) between the estimated CH 4 emission rates for 11–16 farms on each measurement day and the number of animal units (AUs, 1 AU equals 500 kg of animal weight) across four individual days. The whole-farm CH 4 emission factors (including both enteric fermentation and manure) for the four separate campaign days were estimated using the slope between the CH 4 emission rates derived from the composite of two distinct wind datasets and the number of AUs. Daily emission factors for the four campaign days were estimated to be in the range of 0.18–0.50 kgCH 4 /d/AU. From the dataset, averaged over each of the four campaign days, we derived an estimate of the whole-farm CH 4 emission factor, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.47 [0.13–0.81] kgCH 4 /d/AU. Our results demonstrate that CH 4 emissions from a large number of dairy cow farms can be rapidly estimated, providing an independent way to evaluate country-specific emission factors and a potential way to monitor future emission reductions.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 20(3)
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL), University of Groningen (NL), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Nanjing University (CN), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Cambridge, European Commission, Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.