The Competitive Edge: Improving American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Scores Through a Team-Based Competition

BackgroundThe American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores are predictive of passing the ABS qualifying exam and have become a marker of residency education success. A competitive team-based approach to encourage self-studying and didactic participation is a novel method of ABSITE preparation. We aimed to determine if this method significantly improves residents' percentile performances on the ABSITE.MethodsRetrospective review of ABSITE percentile scores were compared before and after implementation of a purchased online question bank (TrueLearn LLC, Mooresville, NC), a team-based competition, and a virtual format of the team-based competition.ResultsThe median ABSITE percentile at the program level increased from 40.0 (IQR 21.0-67.0) in 2011 to 77.0 by 2022 (IQR 60.0-91.0) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After implementation of the team-based competition, ABSITE median percentile rose significantly from 67.0 (IQR 31.5-85.5) to 84.5 (IQR 60.8-91.0) (<i>P</i> = 0.026). This did not change significantly after a transition to a virtual format of the team-based competition in 2021 (<i>P</i> = 0.146) and 2022 (<i>P</i> = 0.335). There was no significant relationship between the number of TrueLearn questions taken and ABSITE scores specifically before and after implementation of the team-based competition (AUC = 0.0002, Spearman's r (67) 0.064, <i>P</i> = 0.605). Furthermore, the team-based competition was well received by residents and was believed to be beneficial to their studying.DiscussionThe team-based competition is easy to implement and improves ABSITE performance through means other than encouraging residents to take more practice questions. The team-based competition is well-received by residents and may prove beneficial to board examination preparation and pass rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251318381
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Competitive Edge: Improving American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Scores Through a Team-Based Competition

Felicia A. Ivascu, Begum Akay, Diane Studzinski, Kathryn K. Howard et al.
The American Surgeon
Innovations in Medical Education
article

The Competitive Edge: Improving American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination Scores Through a Team-Based Competition

Felicia A. Ivascu, Begum Akay, Diane Studzinski, Kathryn K. Howard, Darci C. Foote, Rose E. Callahan, Sean E. Masters, Joshua Halka
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ABSITE) scores are predictive of passing the ABS qualifying exam and have become a marker of residency education success. A competitive team-based approach to encourage self-studying and didactic participation is a novel method of ABSITE preparation. We aimed to determine if this method significantly improves residents' percentile performances on the ABSITE.MethodsRetrospective review of ABSITE percentile scores were compared before and after implementation of a purchased online question bank (TrueLearn LLC, Mooresville, NC), a team-based competition, and a virtual format of the team-based competition.ResultsThe median ABSITE percentile at the program level increased from 40.0 (IQR 21.0-67.0) in 2011 to 77.0 by 2022 (IQR 60.0-91.0) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After implementation of the team-based competition, ABSITE median percentile rose significantly from 67.0 (IQR 31.5-85.5) to 84.5 (IQR 60.8-91.0) (<i>P</i> = 0.026). This did not change significantly after a transition to a virtual format of the team-based competition in 2021 (<i>P</i> = 0.146) and 2022 (<i>P</i> = 0.335). There was no significant relationship between the number of TrueLearn questions taken and ABSITE scores specifically before and after implementation of the team-based competition (AUC = 0.0002, Spearman's r (67) 0.064, <i>P</i> = 0.605). Furthermore, the team-based competition was well received by residents and was believed to be beneficial to their studying.DiscussionThe team-based competition is easy to implement and improves ABSITE performance through means other than encouraging residents to take more practice questions. The team-based competition is well-received by residents and may prove beneficial to board examination preparation and pass rates.

The American SurgeonVol. 91(6)
Oakland University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.