Comparative analysis of two methyl acetate production technologies: Investigation based on process modelling and simulation

• Technical evaluation of two methyl acetate production technologies; • Reactive distillation of acetic acid with methanol and carbonylation of DME for methyl acetate production; • Process modelling and simulation of the proposed technologies; • Natural gas as starting raw-material for methyl acetate production; • The production of methyl acetate through DME carbonylation is more energetically efficient. The present research study focuses on simulating and comparing two technologies for the methyl acetate production process. The two investigated technologies are represented by the reactive distillation of acetic acid with methanol and carbonylation of dimethyl ether. Both processes use natural gas as the starting raw material and involve the transformation of synthesis gas into methanol. Subsequently, methanol acts as a precursor for either acetic acid or dimethyl ether production, depending on the selected technology. CHEMCAD process simulator software was used as a chemical engineering tool for generating mass and heat balances on which various technical key performance indicators (i.e., energy consumption, equipment requirements, and overall efficiency) were furthermore calculated and compared. The simulation study encompasses the entire production chain, from synthesis gas generation to final methyl acetate synthesis, offering detailed descriptions, assumptions, and discussions of each step. A productivity of 250 kmol/h, equivalent to 18,519.75 kg/h, was set for both production routes. The novelty aspects of the present study consist of a detailed technical evaluation of the two proposed technologies The study demonstrates that the production of methyl acetate through the carbonylation of dimethyl ether is more energetically efficient than the production via reactive distillation of methanol with acetic acid. Moreover, the production of methyl acetate through the carbonylation of dimethyl ether achieved a higher purity of methyl acetate, a lower thermal consumption, a lower electric power consumption, and a reduced number of equipments indicating a more efficient and higher quality production process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134586
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of two methyl acetate production technologies: Investigation based on process modelling and simulation

Letitia Petrescu, Daniela Mica
2 citations
Fuel
Process Optimization and Integration
2.43
article

Comparative analysis of two methyl acetate production technologies: Investigation based on process modelling and simulation

Letitia Petrescu, Daniela Mica
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Technical evaluation of two methyl acetate production technologies; • Reactive distillation of acetic acid with methanol and carbonylation of DME for methyl acetate production; • Process modelling and simulation of the proposed technologies; • Natural gas as starting raw-material for methyl acetate production; • The production of methyl acetate through DME carbonylation is more energetically efficient. The present research study focuses on simulating and comparing two technologies for the methyl acetate production process. The two investigated technologies are represented by the reactive distillation of acetic acid with methanol and carbonylation of dimethyl ether. Both processes use natural gas as the starting raw material and involve the transformation of synthesis gas into methanol. Subsequently, methanol acts as a precursor for either acetic acid or dimethyl ether production, depending on the selected technology. CHEMCAD process simulator software was used as a chemical engineering tool for generating mass and heat balances on which various technical key performance indicators (i.e., energy consumption, equipment requirements, and overall efficiency) were furthermore calculated and compared. The simulation study encompasses the entire production chain, from synthesis gas generation to final methyl acetate synthesis, offering detailed descriptions, assumptions, and discussions of each step. A productivity of 250 kmol/h, equivalent to 18,519.75 kg/h, was set for both production routes. The novelty aspects of the present study consist of a detailed technical evaluation of the two proposed technologies The study demonstrates that the production of methyl acetate through the carbonylation of dimethyl ether is more energetically efficient than the production via reactive distillation of methanol with acetic acid. Moreover, the production of methyl acetate through the carbonylation of dimethyl ether achieved a higher purity of methyl acetate, a lower thermal consumption, a lower electric power consumption, and a reduced number of equipments indicating a more efficient and higher quality production process.

FuelVol. 388
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Process Optimization and Integration
2.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.