Exploring the Ethics of Generative AI, Education, and Democracy

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly being used in educational contexts, withmostly unsubstantiated claims that it will personalise learning and save teacher time. In fact, the supposed benefits of such outcomes remain both uncertain (do they happen?) and unclear (are they worth having?). Accordingly, in this paper, we explore the impact of GenAI on education, arguing that it poses significant threats to ethical values and democratic principles. Key concerns include the opacity and biases inherent in GenAI systems, the challenges to teacher agency and student learning, and the threats to values such as inclusivity, equity, human rights, transparency and accountability. We note that GenAI tools also make it easier to generate misinformation that can mislead students and teachers, potentially eroding trust in information altogether. We begin by unpacking the core constructs of GenAI, education, democracy, and ethics, highlighting how standard understandings often overlook details that are fundamental for effective education in democratic societies. We then analyse the impacts of GenAI on education and democracy through the lens of an ethical framework. We conclude by arguing that the growing impact of GenAI on education demands a comprehensive and critical AI literacy that prioritizes the human dimension - understanding the ethical considerations, social implications, and human impacts of these technologies. Only then can educators make informed decisions about whether and how to responsibly use GenAI, and how to align its use with democratic ideals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of artificial intelligence for sustainable development.
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69828/4d4kqf
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Ethics of Generative AI, Education, and Democracy

W. Holmes, Sopio Zhgenti
3 citations
Journal of artificial intelligence for sustainable development.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
article

Exploring the Ethics of Generative AI, Education, and Democracy

W. Holmes, Sopio Zhgenti
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly being used in educational contexts, withmostly unsubstantiated claims that it will personalise learning and save teacher time. In fact, the supposed benefits of such outcomes remain both uncertain (do they happen?) and unclear (are they worth having?). Accordingly, in this paper, we explore the impact of GenAI on education, arguing that it poses significant threats to ethical values and democratic principles. Key concerns include the opacity and biases inherent in GenAI systems, the challenges to teacher agency and student learning, and the threats to values such as inclusivity, equity, human rights, transparency and accountability. We note that GenAI tools also make it easier to generate misinformation that can mislead students and teachers, potentially eroding trust in information altogether. We begin by unpacking the core constructs of GenAI, education, democracy, and ethics, highlighting how standard understandings often overlook details that are fundamental for effective education in democratic societies. We then analyse the impacts of GenAI on education and democracy through the lens of an ethical framework. We conclude by arguing that the growing impact of GenAI on education demands a comprehensive and critical AI literacy that prioritizes the human dimension - understanding the ethical considerations, social implications, and human impacts of these technologies. Only then can educators make informed decisions about whether and how to responsibly use GenAI, and how to align its use with democratic ideals.

Journal of artificial intelligence for sustainable development.Vol. 1(1)
Faculty (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.