Time-out placements in residential care: Towards a better understanding of restrictive measures in response to the behavioral manifestations of vulnerable youths

Youth in care are significantly more likely to exhibit intense behavioral manifestations (behavior that puts the youth or those around him at risk, or challenges the therapeutic relationship) than are youth in the general population and the majority have a history of multiple traumas. When youth behavior escalate, efforts are made to mitigate these behaviors. In Quebec (Canada), one such strategy is time-out placement (TOP). TOP is a short-term placement whose main objective is to temporarily separate a youth manifesting severe behaviors from the environment in which these behaviors occur. However, literature on trauma-informed practice suggests that TOP may present an increased risk of placement instability. Our study aims to analyze differences between youth who have experienced this measure and those who have not in their placement trajectory, in the restrictive measures employed and in their behavior. The population (N = 3755) consisted of all youth (12–17 years old) having experienced residential care placement one day or longer, between the years 2014 and 2019, in Montreal. To control the potential effect of trajectory in childhood, a propensity score matching method was used to analyze the data extracted and create two groups based on the presence or absence of TOP in adolescence, then compared using hierarchical logistic regression. The results show that youth who have been subjected to at least one TOP in adolescence are more likely to exhibit behaviors of such intensity as to prompt the use of restrictive measures, and that the use of TOPs in the context of runaways may be commonplace. Indeed, TOPs are also associated with greater placement instability. Our study supports recommendations to reform the intervention paradigm of child welfare services and institutions, rethinking current approaches to meeting the needs of youths in care to ensure that care becomes more trauma-sensitive. • The likelihood of experiencing a Time-out placement increased with time spent in care. • Youths with at least one Time-out placement experience more restrictive measures. • Each running away increases youths' risk of experiencing a Time-out placement. • Placement moves are more likely for youths with at least one Time-out placement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Protection and Practice
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100113
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time-out placements in residential care: Towards a better understanding of restrictive measures in response to the behavioral manifestations of vulnerable youths

Marie-Noële Royer, Thomas J. Esposito, Sophie T. Hébert, Sonia Hélie
1 citations
Child Protection and Practice
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
article

Time-out placements in residential care: Towards a better understanding of restrictive measures in response to the behavioral manifestations of vulnerable youths

Marie-Noële Royer, Thomas J. Esposito, Sophie T. Hébert, Sonia Hélie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Youth in care are significantly more likely to exhibit intense behavioral manifestations (behavior that puts the youth or those around him at risk, or challenges the therapeutic relationship) than are youth in the general population and the majority have a history of multiple traumas. When youth behavior escalate, efforts are made to mitigate these behaviors. In Quebec (Canada), one such strategy is time-out placement (TOP). TOP is a short-term placement whose main objective is to temporarily separate a youth manifesting severe behaviors from the environment in which these behaviors occur. However, literature on trauma-informed practice suggests that TOP may present an increased risk of placement instability. Our study aims to analyze differences between youth who have experienced this measure and those who have not in their placement trajectory, in the restrictive measures employed and in their behavior. The population (N = 3755) consisted of all youth (12–17 years old) having experienced residential care placement one day or longer, between the years 2014 and 2019, in Montreal. To control the potential effect of trajectory in childhood, a propensity score matching method was used to analyze the data extracted and create two groups based on the presence or absence of TOP in adolescence, then compared using hierarchical logistic regression. The results show that youth who have been subjected to at least one TOP in adolescence are more likely to exhibit behaviors of such intensity as to prompt the use of restrictive measures, and that the use of TOPs in the context of runaways may be commonplace. Indeed, TOPs are also associated with greater placement instability. Our study supports recommendations to reform the intervention paradigm of child welfare services and institutions, rethinking current approaches to meeting the needs of youths in care to ensure that care becomes more trauma-sensitive. • The likelihood of experiencing a Time-out placement increased with time spent in care. • Youths with at least one Time-out placement experience more restrictive measures. • Each running away increases youths' risk of experiencing a Time-out placement. • Placement moves are more likely for youths with at least one Time-out placement.

Child Protection and PracticeVol. 4
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Child Welfare and Adoption
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.