Mindfulness and Reporting Incentives in Risk Management: an Analysis of Japanese High-Reliability Organizations

This study examines the impact of mindfulness and reporting incentives on risk communication within Japanese high-reliability organizations (HROs). Eleven companies were categorized into three groups based on human and economic impact: Group I (high human and economic impact), Group II (low human, high economic impact), and Group III (low human and economic impact). Group I, including public and telecommunications infrastructure companies, emphasized risk reporting’s effect on evaluations, strict manual adherence, and decentralized reporting. Group II, comprising banks and construction companies, had centralized authority and a culture promoting early reporting to supervisors. Group III, consisting of hotels, manufacturers, and advertising agencies, maintained traditional seniority-based systems with minimal performance-based incentives, relying on employee loyalty. The study reveals significant differences in risk management practices across groups and underscores the necessity for explicit risk communication and decision-making guidelines in Japanese firms, highlighting the need for industry-specific strategies to enhance mindfulness and incentivize reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ieem62345.2024.10857064
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mindfulness and Reporting Incentives in Risk Management: an Analysis of Japanese High-Reliability Organizations

N. Imura
Risk Management in Financial Firms
article

Mindfulness and Reporting Incentives in Risk Management: an Analysis of Japanese High-Reliability Organizations

N. Imura
article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of mindfulness and reporting incentives on risk communication within Japanese high-reliability organizations (HROs). Eleven companies were categorized into three groups based on human and economic impact: Group I (high human and economic impact), Group II (low human, high economic impact), and Group III (low human and economic impact). Group I, including public and telecommunications infrastructure companies, emphasized risk reporting’s effect on evaluations, strict manual adherence, and decentralized reporting. Group II, comprising banks and construction companies, had centralized authority and a culture promoting early reporting to supervisors. Group III, consisting of hotels, manufacturers, and advertising agencies, maintained traditional seniority-based systems with minimal performance-based incentives, relying on employee loyalty. The study reveals significant differences in risk management practices across groups and underscores the necessity for explicit risk communication and decision-making guidelines in Japanese firms, highlighting the need for industry-specific strategies to enhance mindfulness and incentivize reporting.

Nagoya Institute of Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mindfulness and Reporting Incentives in Risk Management: an Analysis of Japanese High-Reliability Organizations — N. Imura · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS