Optimizing the mechanical performance of nacre‐like hydroxyapatite/polymethylmethacrylate–polyacrylic acid composites with apatite‐wollastonite

Abstract Biomimetic materials inspired by the hierarchical structure of nacre offer promising opportunities to enhance the mechanical strength and toughness of load‐bearing bone implants. This study investigates the incorporation of apatite‐wollastonite (AW) into nacre‐like hydroxyapatite (HA)/polymethylmethacrylate–polyacrylic acid (PMMA–PAA) composites to improve their mechanical properties. The composite mimics the natural nacre structure, featuring a brick‐and‐mortar architecture where ceramic components form the “bricks,” and the polymer phase acts as the “mortar.” The results showed that adding AW significantly increased the density of the ceramic scaffolds and improved the sinterability of HA. However, at higher AW concentrations (e.g., 20 wt%), excessive grain growth was observed, which could negatively affect the composite's mechanical properties. The best mechanical performance was achieved at 15 wt% AW, which enhanced the sintering process and reinforced the HA through the formation of a stronger wollastonite phase, as revealed by x‐ray diffraction analysis. Mechanical testing showed that the composite with 15 wt% AW exhibited superior properties, with flexural strength increasing from 158.2 ± 7.1 MPa (for HA/PMMA–PAA) to 188.7 ± 6.2 MPa (for AW–HA/PMMA–PAA). Fracture toughness also improved significantly, from 5.2 to 10.2 MPa m 1/2 . In addition to improved flexural strength and fracture toughness, the composite's Young's modulus of 28.5 ± 1.6 GPa closely matched that of cortical bone, reducing the risk of stress shielding, a common issue with commercial implants. Acellular bioactivity tests demonstrated the formation of a biologically relevant apatite layer on the composite surface, indicating its potential to promote osseointegration. Cytocompatibility assays confirmed favorable cell proliferation and viability, supporting its suitability for clinical applications. In summary, the addition of AW enhanced sinterability and introduced a stronger wollastonite phase within the HA ceramic layer, leading to improved strength and toughness of the nacre‐like HA/PMMA–PAA composites. However, there was an optimal AW concentration that balanced superior mechanical properties with controlled grain growth. The bioactive and cytocompatible composites showed great promise as candidates for next‐generation load‐bearing bone implants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.20416
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the mechanical performance of nacre‐like hydroxyapatite/polymethylmethacrylate–polyacrylic acid composites with apatite‐wollastonite

Bo Su, James P. K. Armstrong, Farnaz Ghorbani, Parinaz Tabrizian et al.
6 citations
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
3.58
article

Optimizing the mechanical performance of nacre‐like hydroxyapatite/polymethylmethacrylate–polyacrylic acid composites with apatite‐wollastonite

Bo Su, James P. K. Armstrong, Farnaz Ghorbani, Parinaz Tabrizian, Tan Sui, Sean A. Davis, Aqsa Qambrani, Huijun Sun
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Biomimetic materials inspired by the hierarchical structure of nacre offer promising opportunities to enhance the mechanical strength and toughness of load‐bearing bone implants. This study investigates the incorporation of apatite‐wollastonite (AW) into nacre‐like hydroxyapatite (HA)/polymethylmethacrylate–polyacrylic acid (PMMA–PAA) composites to improve their mechanical properties. The composite mimics the natural nacre structure, featuring a brick‐and‐mortar architecture where ceramic components form the “bricks,” and the polymer phase acts as the “mortar.” The results showed that adding AW significantly increased the density of the ceramic scaffolds and improved the sinterability of HA. However, at higher AW concentrations (e.g., 20 wt%), excessive grain growth was observed, which could negatively affect the composite's mechanical properties. The best mechanical performance was achieved at 15 wt% AW, which enhanced the sintering process and reinforced the HA through the formation of a stronger wollastonite phase, as revealed by x‐ray diffraction analysis. Mechanical testing showed that the composite with 15 wt% AW exhibited superior properties, with flexural strength increasing from 158.2 ± 7.1 MPa (for HA/PMMA–PAA) to 188.7 ± 6.2 MPa (for AW–HA/PMMA–PAA). Fracture toughness also improved significantly, from 5.2 to 10.2 MPa m 1/2 . In addition to improved flexural strength and fracture toughness, the composite's Young's modulus of 28.5 ± 1.6 GPa closely matched that of cortical bone, reducing the risk of stress shielding, a common issue with commercial implants. Acellular bioactivity tests demonstrated the formation of a biologically relevant apatite layer on the composite surface, indicating its potential to promote osseointegration. Cytocompatibility assays confirmed favorable cell proliferation and viability, supporting its suitability for clinical applications. In summary, the addition of AW enhanced sinterability and introduced a stronger wollastonite phase within the HA ceramic layer, leading to improved strength and toughness of the nacre‐like HA/PMMA–PAA composites. However, there was an optimal AW concentration that balanced superior mechanical properties with controlled grain growth. The bioactive and cytocompatible composites showed great promise as candidates for next‐generation load‐bearing bone implants.

Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyVol. 108(11)
University Of Bristol Dental Hospital (GB), University of Surrey (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.