Toward a Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence System Considering Security, Ethics, and Quality

Recently, various risks have been pointed out in artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In particular, AI security, AI ethics, and AI quality are considerable risks. To make AI systems trustworthy against these risks, risk assessment technology is needed to identify potential AI risks and decide which risks should be dealt with in priority. We propose a risk assessment technology that assesses three kinds of risks—AI security, AI ethics, and AI quality—which have been considered separately. Our technology follows the ISO 31000 framework, consisting of four phases: risk candidate identification, impact assessment, likelihood assessment, and priority derivation for countermeasures. To realize this technology, risk candidate identification is achieved by extending AI ethics impact assessment— an identification method of AI ethics risk—to AI security and AI quality. Impact and likelihood assessments are conducted by extending assessment methods for AI security to AI ethics and AI quality. We conducted a case study using our technology and confirmed that the risks were appropriately extracted, and the priority of the risks to be dealt with was derived.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/prdc63035.2024.00017
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence System Considering Security, Ethics, and Quality

Masaru Ide, Kyoko Ohashi, Satoko Shiga, Jun Yajima et al.
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Toward a Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence System Considering Security, Ethics, and Quality

Masaru Ide, Kyoko Ohashi, Satoko Shiga, Jun Yajima, Sachiko Onodera, Hiroshi Tanaka
article en

Abstract

Recently, various risks have been pointed out in artificial intelligence (AI) systems. In particular, AI security, AI ethics, and AI quality are considerable risks. To make AI systems trustworthy against these risks, risk assessment technology is needed to identify potential AI risks and decide which risks should be dealt with in priority. We propose a risk assessment technology that assesses three kinds of risks—AI security, AI ethics, and AI quality—which have been considered separately. Our technology follows the ISO 31000 framework, consisting of four phases: risk candidate identification, impact assessment, likelihood assessment, and priority derivation for countermeasures. To realize this technology, risk candidate identification is achieved by extending AI ethics impact assessment— an identification method of AI ethics risk—to AI security and AI quality. Impact and likelihood assessments are conducted by extending assessment methods for AI security to AI ethics and AI quality. We conducted a case study using our technology and confirmed that the risks were appropriately extracted, and the priority of the risks to be dealt with was derived.

Fujitsu (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward a Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence System Considering Security, Ethics, and Quality — Masaru Ide, Kyoko Ohashi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS