Remote Super-Resolution Mapping of Wave Fields

Mapping wave field in space has many applications such as optimizing design of radio antennas, improving and developing ultrasound transducers, and planning and monitoring the treatment of tumors using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Currently, there are methods that can map wave fields remotely or locally. However, there are limitations to these methods. For example, when mapping the wave fields remotely, the spatial resolution is limited due to a poor diffraction-limited resolution of the receiver, especially when the f-number of the receiver is large. To map the wave fields locally, the receiver is either subject to damage in hazardous environments (corrosive media, high temperature, high wave intensity, and so on) or difficult to be placed inside an object. To address these limitations, in this article, the point spread function (PSF)-modulation super-resolution imaging method was applied to map pulse ultrasound wave fields remotely at a high spatial resolution, overcoming the diffraction limit of a focused receiver. For example, to map a pulse ultrasound field of a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) beamwidth of 1.24 mm at the focal distance of a transmitter, the FWHM beamwidths of the super-resolution mapping of the pulse wave field with a spherical glass modulator of 0.7 mm diameter at two receiver angles (0° and 45°) were about 1.13 and 1.22 mm, respectively, which were close to the theoretical value of 1.24 mm and were much smaller than the diffraction-limited resolution (1.81 mm) of the receiver. Without using the super-resolution method to remotely map the same pulse wave field, the FWHM beamwidth was about 2.06 mm. For comparison, the FWHM beamwidth obtained with a broadband (1-20 MHz) and 0.6-mm-diameter polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) needle hydrophone was about 1.41 mm. In addition to the focused pulse ultrasound wave field, a pulse Bessel beam near the transducer surface was mapped remotely with the super-resolution method, which revealed high spatial frequency components of the beam.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tuffc.2025.3538607
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote Super-Resolution Mapping of Wave Fields

Jian-yu Lu
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
5.60
article

Remote Super-Resolution Mapping of Wave Fields

Jian-yu Lu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Mapping wave field in space has many applications such as optimizing design of radio antennas, improving and developing ultrasound transducers, and planning and monitoring the treatment of tumors using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Currently, there are methods that can map wave fields remotely or locally. However, there are limitations to these methods. For example, when mapping the wave fields remotely, the spatial resolution is limited due to a poor diffraction-limited resolution of the receiver, especially when the f-number of the receiver is large. To map the wave fields locally, the receiver is either subject to damage in hazardous environments (corrosive media, high temperature, high wave intensity, and so on) or difficult to be placed inside an object. To address these limitations, in this article, the point spread function (PSF)-modulation super-resolution imaging method was applied to map pulse ultrasound wave fields remotely at a high spatial resolution, overcoming the diffraction limit of a focused receiver. For example, to map a pulse ultrasound field of a full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) beamwidth of 1.24 mm at the focal distance of a transmitter, the FWHM beamwidths of the super-resolution mapping of the pulse wave field with a spherical glass modulator of 0.7 mm diameter at two receiver angles (0° and 45°) were about 1.13 and 1.22 mm, respectively, which were close to the theoretical value of 1.24 mm and were much smaller than the diffraction-limited resolution (1.81 mm) of the receiver. Without using the super-resolution method to remotely map the same pulse wave field, the FWHM beamwidth was about 2.06 mm. For comparison, the FWHM beamwidth obtained with a broadband (1-20 MHz) and 0.6-mm-diameter polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) needle hydrophone was about 1.41 mm. In addition to the focused pulse ultrasound wave field, a pulse Bessel beam near the transducer surface was mapped remotely with the super-resolution method, which revealed high spatial frequency components of the beam.

IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlVol. 72(3)
University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
5.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.