Shallow seamounts are “oases” and activity hubs for pelagic predators in a large-scale marine reserve
Seamounts have been likened to "oases" of life in the comparative deserts of the open ocean, often harbouring high densities of threatened and exploited pelagic top predators. However, few such aggregations have been studied in any detail and the mechanisms that sustain them are poorly understood. Here, we present the findings of an integrated study of 3 previously unexplored seamounts in the tropical Atlantic, which aimed to investigate their significance as predator "hotspots" and inform their inclusion in one of world's largest marine reserves. Baited underwater video and visual census transects revealed enhanced diversity and biomass of pelagic top predators, including elevated abundances of 7 species of sharks, predatory fish, and seabirds, within 5 km of 2 shallow seamounts (<100 m), but not a third deeper seamount (260 m). Hydroacoustic biomass of low- and mid-trophic level "prey" was also significantly elevated within 2.5 km of shallow seamounts. However, we found no evidence of enhanced primary productivity over any feature, suggesting high faunal biomass is sustained by exogenous energy inputs. Relative biomass enrichment also increased with trophic level, ranging from a 2-fold increase for zooplankton to a 41-fold increase for sharks. Tracking of the dominant predator species revealed that individual sharks (Galapagos, silky) and tuna (yellowfin, bigeye) often resided around seamounts for months to years, with evidence of connectivity between features, and (in the case of sharks) were spatially aggregated in localised hotspots that coincided with areas of high mid-trophic biomass. However, tuna and silky sharks also appeared to use seamounts as "hubs" in more extensive pelagic foraging ranges, which may help explain disproportionately high predator density. Our results reinforce the conservation significance of shallow seamounts for many marine top predators and offer fundamental insights into their functional roles as both prey "oases" and activity hubs for these species.
Authors
- Matthew J. Witt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9498-5378)
- Brendan J. Godley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-0034)
- Christopher D. H. Thompson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-0221)
- Sam B. Weber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1447-4082)
- Nigel E. Hussey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9050-6077)
- Jessica J. Meeuwig (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1169-8785)
- Nicola Weber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-3727)
- Paul Rose (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5375-8267)
- Annette C. Broderick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-1782)
- Judith Brown
- Fabio Campanella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-1791)
- Andrew J. Richardson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-7534)
Institutions
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (GB)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- National Geographic Society (US)
- National Research Council (IT)
- University of Windsor (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS Biology
- Published
- 2025-02-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003016
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 9.25
Funders
- National Geographic Society
- New Zealand Government
- European Commission
- Darwin Initiative
- British Antarctic Survey