Evaluation of Co-firing in a Pulverized Coal Boiler Using Multi-Biomass: Sawdust and Rice Husks

This study investigates the impact of co-firing biomass with coal at Pulverized Coal (PC) Boiler-type power plant. While fossil fuels, particularly coal, continue to dominate global energy production, they significantly contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite efforts to reduce coal-fired power generation capacity in Indonesia, coal remains a major component of the country's energy mix. To support the government's renewable energy goals and reduce GHG emissions, biomass co-firing is being explored as a viable solution. Various biomass types, including saw dust, rice husks, cocopeat, and palm shells, were evaluated for their potential in co-firing applications. Unlike other studies that utilize a single type of biomass, this study employs multiple biomass types, specifically sawdust and rice husks. The use of multi-biomass offers an alternative solution to the challenge of biomass feedstock availability. This research assesses both the technical and economic feasibility of biomass co-firing, with a focus on gross calorific value (GCV), Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI), generation cost and emissions reduction. Laboratory tests and combustion modeling were conducted to analyze the performance and environmental impacts. The results indicate that biomass co-firing can effectively reduce emissions while maintaining operational performance, positioning it as a promising strategy for sustainable energy production in Indonesia. In this paper, the authors aim to explore the impact of biomass utilization as a co-firing material in a PC Boiler power plant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iceecit63698.2024.10859495
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Co-firing in a Pulverized Coal Boiler Using Multi-Biomass: Sawdust and Rice Husks

Sarjiya Sarjiya, Tumiran, Faqih Alfaruq
1 citations
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.18
article

Evaluation of Co-firing in a Pulverized Coal Boiler Using Multi-Biomass: Sawdust and Rice Husks

Sarjiya Sarjiya, Tumiran, Faqih Alfaruq
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of co-firing biomass with coal at Pulverized Coal (PC) Boiler-type power plant. While fossil fuels, particularly coal, continue to dominate global energy production, they significantly contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Despite efforts to reduce coal-fired power generation capacity in Indonesia, coal remains a major component of the country's energy mix. To support the government's renewable energy goals and reduce GHG emissions, biomass co-firing is being explored as a viable solution. Various biomass types, including saw dust, rice husks, cocopeat, and palm shells, were evaluated for their potential in co-firing applications. Unlike other studies that utilize a single type of biomass, this study employs multiple biomass types, specifically sawdust and rice husks. The use of multi-biomass offers an alternative solution to the challenge of biomass feedstock availability. This research assesses both the technical and economic feasibility of biomass co-firing, with a focus on gross calorific value (GCV), Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI), generation cost and emissions reduction. Laboratory tests and combustion modeling were conducted to analyze the performance and environmental impacts. The results indicate that biomass co-firing can effectively reduce emissions while maintaining operational performance, positioning it as a promising strategy for sustainable energy production in Indonesia. In this paper, the authors aim to explore the impact of biomass utilization as a co-firing material in a PC Boiler power plant.

Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.