Cultural ecosystem services and opportunities for inclusive and effective nature-based solutions

The concept of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) is increasingly applied to sustainable land use change research, policy and planning. Despite an evolving understanding of CES in the research community, policy and planning have not kept up with deeper and more progressive framings of CES. This disjuncture risks the underappreciation of diverse, intrinsic, plural and relational perspectives of CES in emerging policies, such as those related to Nature-based Solutions (NbS) driven by net-zero targets, which in turn hinders the capacity of NbS to deliver their multiple intended benefits. In this article, we examine how the CES concept has been framed and operationalised in recent research on sustainable land use policy, and explore the extent to which the concept of CES has been applied in UK central government policy related to Nature-based Solutions. We highlight the benefits that are emerging of adopting a deeper and more nuanced framing of CES, found in a range of case studies in academic literature. We suggest next steps for a research agenda to better understand the benefits and opportunities of more nuanced CES approaches for particular initiatives and contexts, including for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions in the UK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108525
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural ecosystem services and opportunities for inclusive and effective nature-based solutions

Izabela Delabre, Fiona Marshall, Simona Panaro
11 citations
Ecological Economics
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
12.16
article

Cultural ecosystem services and opportunities for inclusive and effective nature-based solutions

Izabela Delabre, Fiona Marshall, Simona Panaro
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The concept of Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) is increasingly applied to sustainable land use change research, policy and planning. Despite an evolving understanding of CES in the research community, policy and planning have not kept up with deeper and more progressive framings of CES. This disjuncture risks the underappreciation of diverse, intrinsic, plural and relational perspectives of CES in emerging policies, such as those related to Nature-based Solutions (NbS) driven by net-zero targets, which in turn hinders the capacity of NbS to deliver their multiple intended benefits. In this article, we examine how the CES concept has been framed and operationalised in recent research on sustainable land use policy, and explore the extent to which the concept of CES has been applied in UK central government policy related to Nature-based Solutions. We highlight the benefits that are emerging of adopting a deeper and more nuanced framing of CES, found in a range of case studies in academic literature. We suggest next steps for a research agenda to better understand the benefits and opportunities of more nuanced CES approaches for particular initiatives and contexts, including for the implementation of Nature-based Solutions in the UK.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 230
University of Sussex (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
12.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cultural ecosystem services and opportunities for inclusive and effective nature-based solutions — Izabela Delabre, Fiona Marshall, et al. · Ecological Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS