Improved Reservoir Porosity Estimation Using an Enhanced Group Method of Data Handling with Differential Evolution Model and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Summary Reservoir characterization is critical to the oil and gas industry, influencing field development, production optimization, hydraulic fracturing, and reserves estimation decisions. Accurately estimating porosity is crucial for reservoir characterization, well planning, and production optimization in the oil and gas industry. Traditional porosity determination methods, such as porosimetry, geostatistical, and core analysis, often involve complex geological and geophysical models, which are expensive and time-consuming. This study used the integrated machine learning and optimization model of differential evolution (DE) with group method of data handling (GMDH-DE) to estimate the porosity using integrated well log and core data from the Mpyo oil field, Uganda. The GMDH-DE demonstrates superior performance compared with conventional GMDH, support vector regression (SVR), and random forest (RF), achieving a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9925 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0017 during training, an R² of 0.9845 with an RMSE of 0.0121 during testing, and when validated the R2 was 0.9825 with RMSE of 0.00018. A key novelty of this work is the integration of Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), which provides an interpretable analysis of the model’s input features. SHAP reveals that bulk density (RHOB) and neutron porosity (NPHI) are the most critical parameters for porosity estimation, offering valuable insight into features importance. The proposed GMDH-DE model and SHAP analysis represent a novel and independent approach for accurate porosity estimation and interpretability, significantly enhancing the efficiency and reliability of hydrocarbon exploration and development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPE Journal
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/224438-pa
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Reservoir Porosity Estimation Using an Enhanced Group Method of Data Handling with Differential Evolution Model and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Christopher N. Mkono, Baraka Leonard Emmanuely, Elieneza Nicodemus Abelly, Chuanbo Shen et al.
5 citations
SPE Journal
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
5.73
article

Improved Reservoir Porosity Estimation Using an Enhanced Group Method of Data Handling with Differential Evolution Model and Explainable Artificial Intelligence

Christopher N. Mkono, Baraka Leonard Emmanuely, Elieneza Nicodemus Abelly, Chuanbo Shen, Alvin K. Mulashani, Erasto E. Kasala, Eric Richard Shanghvi, Thabiso Mokobodi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Summary Reservoir characterization is critical to the oil and gas industry, influencing field development, production optimization, hydraulic fracturing, and reserves estimation decisions. Accurately estimating porosity is crucial for reservoir characterization, well planning, and production optimization in the oil and gas industry. Traditional porosity determination methods, such as porosimetry, geostatistical, and core analysis, often involve complex geological and geophysical models, which are expensive and time-consuming. This study used the integrated machine learning and optimization model of differential evolution (DE) with group method of data handling (GMDH-DE) to estimate the porosity using integrated well log and core data from the Mpyo oil field, Uganda. The GMDH-DE demonstrates superior performance compared with conventional GMDH, support vector regression (SVR), and random forest (RF), achieving a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9925 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0017 during training, an R² of 0.9845 with an RMSE of 0.0121 during testing, and when validated the R2 was 0.9825 with RMSE of 0.00018. A key novelty of this work is the integration of Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), which provides an interpretable analysis of the model’s input features. SHAP reveals that bulk density (RHOB) and neutron porosity (NPHI) are the most critical parameters for porosity estimation, offering valuable insight into features importance. The proposed GMDH-DE model and SHAP analysis represent a novel and independent approach for accurate porosity estimation and interpretability, significantly enhancing the efficiency and reliability of hydrocarbon exploration and development.

SPE JournalVol. 30(04)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), Mbeya University of Science and Technology (TZ), University of Petroleum (ID), University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
5.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.