Can Ambivalent Heritage Embody a Nation? The Meaning‐Making of Japanese Colonial Legacies in Contemporary Taiwan

ABSTRACT This study explores how state and nonstate actors endorsed and utilised heritage from the Japanese colonial era to redevelop the cultural discourse supporting Taiwanese nationalism. Grounded in the methodological approach to social constructionism, this study examines how these actors created and recreated the meanings of ‘ambivalent’ heritage places to embody Taiwan as one ‘imagined community’. The results suggest that the state invented and reinvented the meaning of colonial‐era heritage to be associated with the political discourse of multiculturalism, social evolution and political modernisation, reinforcing its legitimacy. Following and even transcending the official narrative, nonstate actors elicited a meaning of the colonial‐era heritage as intertextually associated with rituals, happy memories, everyday environment and individual experiences, revealing who served as the nationalists reconstructing the ‘national’ culture in a social context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nations and Nationalism
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.13095
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Ambivalent Heritage Embody a Nation? The Meaning‐Making of Japanese Colonial Legacies in Contemporary Taiwan

Ming‐li Yao
Nations and Nationalism
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Can Ambivalent Heritage Embody a Nation? The Meaning‐Making of Japanese Colonial Legacies in Contemporary Taiwan

Ming‐li Yao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores how state and nonstate actors endorsed and utilised heritage from the Japanese colonial era to redevelop the cultural discourse supporting Taiwanese nationalism. Grounded in the methodological approach to social constructionism, this study examines how these actors created and recreated the meanings of ‘ambivalent’ heritage places to embody Taiwan as one ‘imagined community’. The results suggest that the state invented and reinvented the meaning of colonial‐era heritage to be associated with the political discourse of multiculturalism, social evolution and political modernisation, reinforcing its legitimacy. Following and even transcending the official narrative, nonstate actors elicited a meaning of the colonial‐era heritage as intertextually associated with rituals, happy memories, everyday environment and individual experiences, revealing who served as the nationalists reconstructing the ‘national’ culture in a social context.

Nations and Nationalism
Soochow University (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.