Assessment of groundwater suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes with probable health threats in a semiarid river basin of South India

In the semiarid river basin of south India, the present study focuses on the appropriateness of water for drinking and irrigation as well as the risks to human health posed by pollutants. A total of 68 groundwater samples were evaluated for irrigation and consumption purposes. With a high electrical conductivity peaking at 3430 μS/cm and an alkaline composition, the groundwater has a high salinity and poor water quality. Durov's figure displays a trend along the dissolution or mixing line and identifies the geochemical facies of groundwater samples. According to water quality indexes, the majority of samples are categorized as unfit for human consumption (26.47%), extremely bad (36.76%), and poor (26.47%). According to elemental concentrations, the data are grouped into three clusters using hierarchical cluster analysis. According to the geographical distribution, nitrate levels are safe over about 320.25 km<sup>2</sup> and dangerous over about 121.10 km<sup>2</sup>, whereas fluoride levels are safe over about 293.92 km<sup>2</sup> and dangerous over about 147.43 km<sup>2</sup>. About 50.65 km<sup>2</sup>, 14.70% of the samples, fell into the no restriction category for irrigation, indicating acceptable standards. Low sodium levels in soils are indicated by parameters like SAR, %Na, PI, RSC, MR, and KR; SAR values fall into the C2S1, C3S1, and C4S1 categories. According to Doneen's diagram, 70.5% of samples had a PI >75, indicating suitability; the Wilcox diagram classified 22.05% of samples as excellent and 69.11% as good to permissible for irrigation. According to human health risk assessment, 75% of babies, 63% of children, 75% of teens, and 54% of adults have THI values >1 for fluoride. About 45% of newborns, 42% of kids, 45% of teenagers, and 29% of adults are at risk for nitrate. Infants, kids, and teenagers are at the danger. In order to safeguard human health against fluoride and nitrate, the study emphasizes the necessity of efficiently managing groundwater resources, lowering agricultural pollution, and assuring clean drinking water. PRACTITIONER POINTS: In the area, 79.25 km<sup>2</sup> has good drinking water quality based on DWQI. Based on IWQI, 70.33 km<sup>2</sup> area is recognized as suitable for agricultural practices. Geogenic and anthropogenic activities contribute to fluoride and nitrate pollution in water. Based on THI, infants and children are more prone to fluoride and nitrate contamination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Environment Research
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70011
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of groundwater suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes with probable health threats in a semiarid river basin of South India

T. Subramani, D. Karunanidhi, B. Gurugnanam, Meera Rajan
6 citations
Water Environment Research
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
4.79
article

Assessment of groundwater suitability for drinking and irrigation purposes with probable health threats in a semiarid river basin of South India

T. Subramani, D. Karunanidhi, B. Gurugnanam, Meera Rajan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In the semiarid river basin of south India, the present study focuses on the appropriateness of water for drinking and irrigation as well as the risks to human health posed by pollutants. A total of 68 groundwater samples were evaluated for irrigation and consumption purposes. With a high electrical conductivity peaking at 3430 μS/cm and an alkaline composition, the groundwater has a high salinity and poor water quality. Durov's figure displays a trend along the dissolution or mixing line and identifies the geochemical facies of groundwater samples. According to water quality indexes, the majority of samples are categorized as unfit for human consumption (26.47%), extremely bad (36.76%), and poor (26.47%). According to elemental concentrations, the data are grouped into three clusters using hierarchical cluster analysis. According to the geographical distribution, nitrate levels are safe over about 320.25 km<sup>2</sup> and dangerous over about 121.10 km<sup>2</sup>, whereas fluoride levels are safe over about 293.92 km<sup>2</sup> and dangerous over about 147.43 km<sup>2</sup>. About 50.65 km<sup>2</sup>, 14.70% of the samples, fell into the no restriction category for irrigation, indicating acceptable standards. Low sodium levels in soils are indicated by parameters like SAR, %Na, PI, RSC, MR, and KR; SAR values fall into the C2S1, C3S1, and C4S1 categories. According to Doneen's diagram, 70.5% of samples had a PI >75, indicating suitability; the Wilcox diagram classified 22.05% of samples as excellent and 69.11% as good to permissible for irrigation. According to human health risk assessment, 75% of babies, 63% of children, 75% of teens, and 54% of adults have THI values >1 for fluoride. About 45% of newborns, 42% of kids, 45% of teenagers, and 29% of adults are at risk for nitrate. Infants, kids, and teenagers are at the danger. In order to safeguard human health against fluoride and nitrate, the study emphasizes the necessity of efficiently managing groundwater resources, lowering agricultural pollution, and assuring clean drinking water. PRACTITIONER POINTS: In the area, 79.25 km<sup>2</sup> has good drinking water quality based on DWQI. Based on IWQI, 70.33 km<sup>2</sup> area is recognized as suitable for agricultural practices. Geogenic and anthropogenic activities contribute to fluoride and nitrate pollution in water. Based on THI, infants and children are more prone to fluoride and nitrate contamination.

Water Environment ResearchVol. 97(2)
Anna University, Chennai (IN), Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science (IN), Gandhigram Rural Institute (IN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
4.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.