Enhancing streamflow drought prediction: integrating wavelet decomposition with deep learning and quantile regression neural network models

Abstract Drought is a significant natural hazard that severely challenges water resource management and agricultural sustainability. This study aims to propose a novel approach for predicting streamflow drought indices (SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12) in humid continental (Stockholm) and semi-arid (ELdiem) climates at different time-steps. The approach utilizes a Quantile Regression Neural Network (QRNN) coupled with wavelet decomposition (WD) techniques. Six mother wavelets (haar, sym8, coif5, bior6.8, demy, and db10) were used to decompose the SDI time series into different frequency bands, helping to identify patterns and trends in drought signals. The QRNN was compared with a tree-based machine learning (ML) model and two deep learning models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results from stand-alone models showed that the LSTM model outperformed others in predicting SDI-3, while the QRNN model performed best in predicting SDI-6 and SDI-12 in both study regions. In the Stockholm station, the hybrid models achieved acceptable accuracy with bior6.8-LSTM2 (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.927), bior6.8-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.962), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.984) performing best for SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12 predictions during the test phase, respectively. For the ELdiem station, the db10-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.926), demy-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.934), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.981) models demonstrated superior performance during the test phase in predicting SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12, highlighting the robust capability of hybrid models across two case studies. The results indicate that combining WD with ML models can produce more accurate hydrological drought predictions than traditional models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Science Informatics
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-025-01736-w
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing streamflow drought prediction: integrating wavelet decomposition with deep learning and quantile regression neural network models

Mohammed Abdallah, Babak Mohammadi, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Majid Cheraghalizadeh et al.
8 citations
Earth Science Informatics
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
8.84
article

Enhancing streamflow drought prediction: integrating wavelet decomposition with deep learning and quantile regression neural network models

Mohammed Abdallah, Babak Mohammadi, Okan Mert Katipoğlu, Majid Cheraghalizadeh, Rachid Oucheikh
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Drought is a significant natural hazard that severely challenges water resource management and agricultural sustainability. This study aims to propose a novel approach for predicting streamflow drought indices (SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12) in humid continental (Stockholm) and semi-arid (ELdiem) climates at different time-steps. The approach utilizes a Quantile Regression Neural Network (QRNN) coupled with wavelet decomposition (WD) techniques. Six mother wavelets (haar, sym8, coif5, bior6.8, demy, and db10) were used to decompose the SDI time series into different frequency bands, helping to identify patterns and trends in drought signals. The QRNN was compared with a tree-based machine learning (ML) model and two deep learning models: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results from stand-alone models showed that the LSTM model outperformed others in predicting SDI-3, while the QRNN model performed best in predicting SDI-6 and SDI-12 in both study regions. In the Stockholm station, the hybrid models achieved acceptable accuracy with bior6.8-LSTM2 (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.927), bior6.8-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.962), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.984) performing best for SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12 predictions during the test phase, respectively. For the ELdiem station, the db10-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.926), demy-QRNN3 (NSE = 0.934), and demy-QRNN2 (NSE = 0.981) models demonstrated superior performance during the test phase in predicting SDI-3, SDI-6, and SDI-12, highlighting the robust capability of hybrid models across two case studies. The results indicate that combining WD with ML models can produce more accurate hydrological drought predictions than traditional models.

Earth Science InformaticsVol. 18(2)
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE), Hohai University (CN), Erzincan Binali Yıldırım University (TR), Lund University (SE), University of Tehran (IR), Agricultural Research Corporation (SD)
Sveriges Meteorologiska och Hydrologiska Institut
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
8.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.