Professional autonomy vs. assessment criteria: teacher agency in the midst of assessment reform

In Finland, there are no high-stakes tests in comprehensive education, but teachers assign students’ final grades. A recent reform introduced a set of assessment criteria to make grades more comparable across Finland. Based on interviews with 66 lower secondary school teachers, the present study examines how Finnish teachers used their agency in the face of this assessment reform. Understanding teacher agency is of great importance, as it plays a key role in mediating teachers’ public power through final assessment. Using typology analysis, we constructed five teacher types, each reflecting a particular type of agency: the enthusiast, the willing executor, the obedient critic, the immune and the rebel. The nature of teachers’ involvement in the reform varied between the types. The differences in teachers’ agency highlight the importance of understanding different types of teacher agency when implementing assessment reforms and providing appropriate support for all types of teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2460476
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Professional autonomy vs. assessment criteria: teacher agency in the midst of assessment reform

Juuso Henrik Nieminen, Laura Ketonen
2 citations
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Education Systems and Policy
17.85
article

Professional autonomy vs. assessment criteria: teacher agency in the midst of assessment reform

Juuso Henrik Nieminen, Laura Ketonen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In Finland, there are no high-stakes tests in comprehensive education, but teachers assign students’ final grades. A recent reform introduced a set of assessment criteria to make grades more comparable across Finland. Based on interviews with 66 lower secondary school teachers, the present study examines how Finnish teachers used their agency in the face of this assessment reform. Understanding teacher agency is of great importance, as it plays a key role in mediating teachers’ public power through final assessment. Using typology analysis, we constructed five teacher types, each reflecting a particular type of agency: the enthusiast, the willing executor, the obedient critic, the immune and the rebel. The nature of teachers’ involvement in the reform varied between the types. The differences in teachers’ agency highlight the importance of understanding different types of teacher agency when implementing assessment reforms and providing appropriate support for all types of teachers.

Journal of Curriculum StudiesVol. 58(2)
Deakin University (AU), Ontario Tech University (CA), Abiola Ajimobi Technical University Ibadan (NG), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Koneen Säätiö
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Education Systems and Policy
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Professional autonomy vs. assessment criteria: teacher agency in the midst of assessment reform — Juuso Henrik Nieminen, Laura Ketonen · Journal of Curriculum Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS