Individual training in shared tasks with different levels of complexity

The functional levels at which individual contingencies are structured within shared ones modify behavioral interactions. This study aimed to identify the effects of individual training at different functional levels on solving shared tasks. Sixty students were organized into six groups, three of which received individual training through the Assembly Task (AT) at varying levels of complexity (contextual, supplementary, and selector), while the remaining groups received no training. Subsequently, in a shared test, all participants solved the AT in dyads. The results indicated that the higher the task complexity, the more trials were required to meet performance criteria. In shared situations, groups that received training had a higher number of correct trials. The conclusions suggest that prior exposure to tasks at different levels of complexity enhances performance in shared situations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v50.i2.90351
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual training in shared tasks with different levels of complexity

María Luisa Cepeda Islas, Rosalinda Arroyo, Carlos Raúl Zenteno Robledo
Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

Individual training in shared tasks with different levels of complexity

María Luisa Cepeda Islas, Rosalinda Arroyo, Carlos Raúl Zenteno Robledo
article en

Abstract

The functional levels at which individual contingencies are structured within shared ones modify behavioral interactions. This study aimed to identify the effects of individual training at different functional levels on solving shared tasks. Sixty students were organized into six groups, three of which received individual training through the Assembly Task (AT) at varying levels of complexity (contextual, supplementary, and selector), while the remaining groups received no training. Subsequently, in a shared test, all participants solved the AT in dyads. The results indicated that the higher the task complexity, the more trials were required to meet performance criteria. In shared situations, groups that received training had a higher number of correct trials. The conclusions suggest that prior exposure to tasks at different levels of complexity enhances performance in shared situations.

Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la ConductaVol. 50(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.