Getting sustainable investments in the forest sector straight: Towards an integrating framework

The World’s forests play a crucial role in environmental, social and economic well-being, but they are under threat from deforestation, climate change and atmospheric pollution. Various intergovernmental bodies since the 1992 ‘Earth’ Summit (UNCED) have used principles, criteria and indicators (PC&I) to evaluate sustainable development and sustainable forest management (SFM) in particular. The financial world has been reluctant to invest in SFM, however, as it cannot be easily simplified and is inherently risky due to the dynamics of nature and external shocks, such as forest fires, storms or draughts. Nevertheless, a range of economic, social, environmental and governance initiatives for evaluating, or reporting on, sustainable forest finance (SFF) have been developed over the years. Some of these relate to the economic aspects of forest management, but formal linkages between SFF and SFM are still being forged. The authors place a selection of these initiatives into an integrating framework to provide a more wholistic approach to determining, and evaluating, what constitutes SFF. The results of this integration exercise reveal a strong preference towards environmental and social criteria, but some elements, notably economic sustainability, are less well featured. The shortcomings and challenges of this preliminary study are discussed. The authors conclude more work is needed to help investors and stakeholders overcome the current complexity and confusion in the world of SFF, and see the wood for the trees. • Forests play a crucial role in improving people's well-being, combating climate change and promoting economic growth. • The financial world is reluctant to make private investments in forests as sustainable forest management cannot easily be simplified. • Economic, social, environmental and governance initiatives are analysed for the potential to evaluate or report on sustainable forest finance. • Based on principles and criteria of sustainable forest finance a multi-bottom line, hierarchically consistent framework for sustainable forest finance is elaborated. • This framework enables investors and stakeholders to overcome the current complexity and confusion in the world of sustainable forest finance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sustainable Finance and Accounting
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josfa.2025.100017
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Quality and Management Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting sustainable investments in the forest sector straight: Towards an integrating framework

Michael Koehl, Timothy Cadman
3 citations
Journal of Sustainable Finance and Accounting
Quality and Management Systems
6.68
article

Getting sustainable investments in the forest sector straight: Towards an integrating framework

Michael Koehl, Timothy Cadman
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The World’s forests play a crucial role in environmental, social and economic well-being, but they are under threat from deforestation, climate change and atmospheric pollution. Various intergovernmental bodies since the 1992 ‘Earth’ Summit (UNCED) have used principles, criteria and indicators (PC&I) to evaluate sustainable development and sustainable forest management (SFM) in particular. The financial world has been reluctant to invest in SFM, however, as it cannot be easily simplified and is inherently risky due to the dynamics of nature and external shocks, such as forest fires, storms or draughts. Nevertheless, a range of economic, social, environmental and governance initiatives for evaluating, or reporting on, sustainable forest finance (SFF) have been developed over the years. Some of these relate to the economic aspects of forest management, but formal linkages between SFF and SFM are still being forged. The authors place a selection of these initiatives into an integrating framework to provide a more wholistic approach to determining, and evaluating, what constitutes SFF. The results of this integration exercise reveal a strong preference towards environmental and social criteria, but some elements, notably economic sustainability, are less well featured. The shortcomings and challenges of this preliminary study are discussed. The authors conclude more work is needed to help investors and stakeholders overcome the current complexity and confusion in the world of SFF, and see the wood for the trees. • Forests play a crucial role in improving people's well-being, combating climate change and promoting economic growth. • The financial world is reluctant to make private investments in forests as sustainable forest management cannot easily be simplified. • Economic, social, environmental and governance initiatives are analysed for the potential to evaluate or report on sustainable forest finance. • Based on principles and criteria of sustainable forest finance a multi-bottom line, hierarchically consistent framework for sustainable forest finance is elaborated. • This framework enables investors and stakeholders to overcome the current complexity and confusion in the world of sustainable forest finance.

Journal of Sustainable Finance and AccountingVol. 5
Griffith University (AU), Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Quality and Management Systems
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.