Crater Dimensions on the Dwarf Planets

Abstract The icy dwarf planets of Pluto, Charon, and Ceres provide important geologic comparisons for each other as they possess similar gravities and experience impacts of similar velocities compared to larger planets and moons. Differences in their impact craters can therefore be attributed to differences in the impactor and/or target compositions. Craters on Ceres show taller rims than craters on Charon, but comparable internal crater dimensions (depth, wall slope, and peak size). It is possible that the non-ice component of the Ceres crust provides additional strength to this outer portion of the crater, maintaining less rim collapse during the modification stage of crater formation, while the warmer central crater region is controlled by the weakness of the icy component. The spreads in depth-to-diameter ratio and wall-slope values for the Pluto data set are not clearly related to preservation state, suggesting that fresh craters on Pluto possess a large variance in these crater dimensions compared to Charon. This could be due to the geologically diverse terrains and depositional histories at different latitudes and longitudes of Pluto. These provide different target properties for each impact, so that even pristine impact craters on Pluto could display a wide range in depths and wall slopes based on the different strength of the target in each area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Planetary Science Journal
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad9fec
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crater Dimensions on the Dwarf Planets

C. B. Olkin, H. A. Weaver, V. J. Bray, P. Schenk et al.
The Planetary Science Journal
Astro and Planetary Science
article

Crater Dimensions on the Dwarf Planets

C. B. Olkin, H. A. Weaver, V. J. Bray, P. Schenk, Susan Benecchi, Michael F. Zeilnhofer, S. A. Stern, O. L. White, J. R. Spencer, K. N. Singer, S. J. Robbins, K. A. Durfey
article en

Abstract

Abstract The icy dwarf planets of Pluto, Charon, and Ceres provide important geologic comparisons for each other as they possess similar gravities and experience impacts of similar velocities compared to larger planets and moons. Differences in their impact craters can therefore be attributed to differences in the impactor and/or target compositions. Craters on Ceres show taller rims than craters on Charon, but comparable internal crater dimensions (depth, wall slope, and peak size). It is possible that the non-ice component of the Ceres crust provides additional strength to this outer portion of the crater, maintaining less rim collapse during the modification stage of crater formation, while the warmer central crater region is controlled by the weakness of the icy component. The spreads in depth-to-diameter ratio and wall-slope values for the Pluto data set are not clearly related to preservation state, suggesting that fresh craters on Pluto possess a large variance in these crater dimensions compared to Charon. This could be due to the geologically diverse terrains and depositional histories at different latitudes and longitudes of Pluto. These provide different target properties for each impact, so that even pristine impact craters on Pluto could display a wide range in depths and wall slopes based on the different strength of the target in each area.

The Planetary Science JournalVol. 6(2)
Southwest Research Institute (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), University of Arizona (US), American Public University System (US), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Lunar and Planetary Institute (US), Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.