The engagement in policy practice of social workers in Germany and Switzerland—A comparative study

Abstract This article presents the results of a cross-sectional quantitative study that, for the first time, examined the engagement of social workers in policy practice (PP) in Germany (n = 1,917) and Switzerland (n = 1,770). The study focused on the following research questions: To what extent do social workers in Germany and Switzerland differ in their (1) identification with political social work, (2) PP engagement, (3) PP skills, (4) received PP training during their studies, and (5) received organizational support for PP? The results suggest that most social workers in both countries strongly identify with the political dimension of social work as outlined in the profession’s global definition. However, the findings indicate rather low levels of PP engagement, PP skills, PP education, and organizational support for PP among respondents in both samples. While this gap between the normative claim and actual involvement in PP was evident in both groups, Swiss respondents were slightly but significantly less involved in all measured domains except for PP education. After a broad and detailed description of the respondents’ involvement in PP, the article concludes with implications for social work practice, education, and further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaf010
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The engagement in policy practice of social workers in Germany and Switzerland—A comparative study

Tobias Kindler, Miriam Burzlaff, Talia Meital Schwartz Tayri
5 citations
The British Journal of Social Work
Social Work Education and Practice
18.28
article

The engagement in policy practice of social workers in Germany and Switzerland—A comparative study

Tobias Kindler, Miriam Burzlaff, Talia Meital Schwartz Tayri
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article presents the results of a cross-sectional quantitative study that, for the first time, examined the engagement of social workers in policy practice (PP) in Germany (n = 1,917) and Switzerland (n = 1,770). The study focused on the following research questions: To what extent do social workers in Germany and Switzerland differ in their (1) identification with political social work, (2) PP engagement, (3) PP skills, (4) received PP training during their studies, and (5) received organizational support for PP? The results suggest that most social workers in both countries strongly identify with the political dimension of social work as outlined in the profession’s global definition. However, the findings indicate rather low levels of PP engagement, PP skills, PP education, and organizational support for PP among respondents in both samples. While this gap between the normative claim and actual involvement in PP was evident in both groups, Swiss respondents were slightly but significantly less involved in all measured domains except for PP education. After a broad and detailed description of the respondents’ involvement in PP, the article concludes with implications for social work practice, education, and further research.

The British Journal of Social WorkVol. 55(4)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), OST - Ostschweizer Fachhochschule (CH), Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences (DE), University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Work Education and Practice
18.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.