Unveiling the potential of organic farming in mitigating beef losses in Sweden

Food loss is a major problem, as it reduces food system efficiency. Loss of animals is of particular importance, as animal production generally has higher environmental impact. The objectives were to estimate beef loss rates on Swedish organic and conventional dairy and beef farms, to determine which system is better, and to calculate the food saving potential of assigning the loss rate of the best-performing system to the other. A material flow analysis based on data from the central register of bovine animals and slaughter weight statistics was performed. The flows included numbers and carcass weights of animals, grouped by breed, sex, age, and management system leaving farms for different destinations. Organic farms lost on average 7.4 % of the yearly initial beef production, compared to the 19 % higher 8.8 % for conventional farms. Due to widely different conditions, comparisons between organic and conventional management should primarily be made per animal group. All animal groups had lower loss rates in the organic than in the conventional system. The food saving potential of ascribing organic loss rates to the conventional animals was 1300 tons of beef per year, equivalent to 10 % of all Swedish farm-level beef losses. Organic dairy and beef farming could be a food loss intervention capable of a notable loss reduction. The results also revealed that there is no goal conflict between increased organic production and reduced food loss in Swedish beef production. • Food loss leads to environmental impact, especially from cattle production. • The objective of this study was to investigate the loss of beef on Swedish organic and conventional cattle farms. • Organic farms had lower beef loss rates for all types of cattle (male and female; dairy, beef and crossbreeds). • If all conventional farms had the same loss rates as organic farms, Swedish beef losses would be 10 % lower. • In addition to pasture-related benefits, organic cattle farming can also play a role for food loss reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Systems
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104262
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unveiling the potential of organic farming in mitigating beef losses in Sweden

Karin Alvåsen, Ingrid Strid, Jesper Rydén, Maria Jacobsen
1 citations
Agricultural Systems
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
article

Unveiling the potential of organic farming in mitigating beef losses in Sweden

Karin Alvåsen, Ingrid Strid, Jesper Rydén, Maria Jacobsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Food loss is a major problem, as it reduces food system efficiency. Loss of animals is of particular importance, as animal production generally has higher environmental impact. The objectives were to estimate beef loss rates on Swedish organic and conventional dairy and beef farms, to determine which system is better, and to calculate the food saving potential of assigning the loss rate of the best-performing system to the other. A material flow analysis based on data from the central register of bovine animals and slaughter weight statistics was performed. The flows included numbers and carcass weights of animals, grouped by breed, sex, age, and management system leaving farms for different destinations. Organic farms lost on average 7.4 % of the yearly initial beef production, compared to the 19 % higher 8.8 % for conventional farms. Due to widely different conditions, comparisons between organic and conventional management should primarily be made per animal group. All animal groups had lower loss rates in the organic than in the conventional system. The food saving potential of ascribing organic loss rates to the conventional animals was 1300 tons of beef per year, equivalent to 10 % of all Swedish farm-level beef losses. Organic dairy and beef farming could be a food loss intervention capable of a notable loss reduction. The results also revealed that there is no goal conflict between increased organic production and reduced food loss in Swedish beef production. • Food loss leads to environmental impact, especially from cattle production. • The objective of this study was to investigate the loss of beef on Swedish organic and conventional cattle farms. • Organic farms had lower beef loss rates for all types of cattle (male and female; dairy, beef and crossbreeds). • If all conventional farms had the same loss rates as organic farms, Swedish beef losses would be 10 % lower. • In addition to pasture-related benefits, organic cattle farming can also play a role for food loss reduction.

Agricultural SystemsVol. 224
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.