Literature Review : Teori-Teori Kepemimpinan

Traditional and modern leadership are two approaches with distinct characteristics and advantages. Traditional leadership is rooted in culture, customs, and values passed down through generations, where the leader's legitimacy is often based on lineage, social status, or collective recognition within the community. This model emphasizes hierarchy, authority, and stability to maintain group harmony. However, in a constantly changing era, the traditional approach is often deemed less flexible as it tends to be static and resistant to adaptation. In contrast, modern leadership emerges in response to the needs of more dynamic and complex societies and organizations. Modern leaders prioritize competence, innovation, and member empowerment, emphasizing effective communication and the ability to adapt to change. Both approaches hold unique relevance in different contexts. Integrating the positive values of traditional and modern leadership can create a more holistic model of leadership aligned with contemporary demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Student Research
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55606/jsr.v3i1.3531
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Literature Review : Teori-Teori Kepemimpinan

Susan Febriantina, Calvin Kimura, Hana Nurkhairani, Muhammad Fajar Bayu Wicaksono et al.
1 citations
Journal of Student Research
Educational Research and Methods
8.93
article

Literature Review : Teori-Teori Kepemimpinan

Susan Febriantina, Calvin Kimura, Hana Nurkhairani, Muhammad Fajar Bayu Wicaksono, Pradipta Afrah Nugraha, Safrina Primadhita
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Traditional and modern leadership are two approaches with distinct characteristics and advantages. Traditional leadership is rooted in culture, customs, and values passed down through generations, where the leader's legitimacy is often based on lineage, social status, or collective recognition within the community. This model emphasizes hierarchy, authority, and stability to maintain group harmony. However, in a constantly changing era, the traditional approach is often deemed less flexible as it tends to be static and resistant to adaptation. In contrast, modern leadership emerges in response to the needs of more dynamic and complex societies and organizations. Modern leaders prioritize competence, innovation, and member empowerment, emphasizing effective communication and the ability to adapt to change. Both approaches hold unique relevance in different contexts. Integrating the positive values of traditional and modern leadership can create a more holistic model of leadership aligned with contemporary demands.

Journal of Student ResearchVol. 3(5)
State University of Jakarta (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Educational Research and Methods
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Literature Review : Teori-Teori Kepemimpinan — Susan Febriantina, Calvin Kimura, et al. · Journal of Student Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS