Supersaturated carbon-dioxide-enhanced backwash of ceramic microfiltration membranes

• CO 2 enhanced backwash cleans ceramic membranes better than water backwash. • Visualization shows bubbles do not form on permeate side of the membrane. • Higher TMP and lower flux during CO 2 backwash compared with DI water backwash. • TMP and flux data during backwash illustrated three stages of bubbles behavior. Supersaturated CO 2 -enhanced backwash (SCEB) was tested as an alternative to clean-water backwash to enhance the effectiveness of foulant removal for ceramic microfiltration membranes. Air bubbles are commonly used to tangentially scour the feed side surface of micro- and ultrafiltration membranes to add scouring and loosen cake layers; this is called air-assisted backwash. Unlike air-assisted backwash, SCEB forces dissolved CO 2 and CO 2 bubbles through membrane pores. In this study, transmembrane pressure (TMP) and flux profiles during SCEB were directly analyzed to reveal the exact nucleation location. The results from constant-flux filtration show that SCEB recovered more filtration TMP compared to DI water backwash, which saves 6.5%, 2.7%, and 6.9% of the energy during lake water, activated sludge, and rendering wastewater filtration, respectively. Visualization of the membrane permeate is done for the first time, confirming that CO 2 bubbles were not formed before entering the membrane matrix. The pressure and flux profiles of SCEB itself were directly monitored. The pressure profile from constant-flux backwash was analyzed to further understand the cleaning mechanism. The results from constant-flux SCEB showed more negative pressure than DI water backwash, which means that CO 2 bubbles went through the membrane pores and created more resistance during SCEB. The visualization confirms that CO 2 bubbles nucleated inside the membrane pores rather than on the permeate side to clear the foulant blocked deep inside the membrane matrix. The behavior of CO 2 bubbles can be divided into three stages during SCEB: i) Permeate flush out, ii) Bubble concentration growth, and iii) Bubble concentration equilibrium. The last stage has the highest concentration of CO 2 bubbles, which work as pore-scrubbing entities and play an important role in better cleaning effectiveness because of the higher nucleation rate, extra shear stress, and greater lifting force.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Separation and Purification Technology
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131915
Primary Topic
Membrane Separation Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supersaturated carbon-dioxide-enhanced backwash of ceramic microfiltration membranes

Weiming Qi, David A. Ladner
Separation and Purification Technology
Membrane Separation Technologies
article

Supersaturated carbon-dioxide-enhanced backwash of ceramic microfiltration membranes

Weiming Qi, David A. Ladner
article en

Abstract

• CO 2 enhanced backwash cleans ceramic membranes better than water backwash. • Visualization shows bubbles do not form on permeate side of the membrane. • Higher TMP and lower flux during CO 2 backwash compared with DI water backwash. • TMP and flux data during backwash illustrated three stages of bubbles behavior. Supersaturated CO 2 -enhanced backwash (SCEB) was tested as an alternative to clean-water backwash to enhance the effectiveness of foulant removal for ceramic microfiltration membranes. Air bubbles are commonly used to tangentially scour the feed side surface of micro- and ultrafiltration membranes to add scouring and loosen cake layers; this is called air-assisted backwash. Unlike air-assisted backwash, SCEB forces dissolved CO 2 and CO 2 bubbles through membrane pores. In this study, transmembrane pressure (TMP) and flux profiles during SCEB were directly analyzed to reveal the exact nucleation location. The results from constant-flux filtration show that SCEB recovered more filtration TMP compared to DI water backwash, which saves 6.5%, 2.7%, and 6.9% of the energy during lake water, activated sludge, and rendering wastewater filtration, respectively. Visualization of the membrane permeate is done for the first time, confirming that CO 2 bubbles were not formed before entering the membrane matrix. The pressure and flux profiles of SCEB itself were directly monitored. The pressure profile from constant-flux backwash was analyzed to further understand the cleaning mechanism. The results from constant-flux SCEB showed more negative pressure than DI water backwash, which means that CO 2 bubbles went through the membrane pores and created more resistance during SCEB. The visualization confirms that CO 2 bubbles nucleated inside the membrane pores rather than on the permeate side to clear the foulant blocked deep inside the membrane matrix. The behavior of CO 2 bubbles can be divided into three stages during SCEB: i) Permeate flush out, ii) Bubble concentration growth, and iii) Bubble concentration equilibrium. The last stage has the highest concentration of CO 2 bubbles, which work as pore-scrubbing entities and play an important role in better cleaning effectiveness because of the higher nucleation rate, extra shear stress, and greater lifting force.

Separation and Purification TechnologyVol. 362
Clemson University (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Membrane Separation Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.