A Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic Prescribing Compliance Rates Between Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases Specialists in the Emergency Department

Background: Antibiotic stewardship is crucial in the emergency department (ED) for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing antimicrobial resistance. Understanding differences in antibiotic prescribing practices between emergency medicine (EM) and infectious diseases (ID) specialists can inform targeted interventions to enhance antibiotic use in the ED setting. This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to compare antibiotic prescription compliance rates with established guidelines between EM and ID specialists within the ED. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Rasool Akram Hospital’s ED in 2022. Data from electronic health records and the prescription database were analyzed to compare antibiotic prescribing compliance rates between EM and ID specialists. Overall, 770 antibiotic prescriptions from the second half of 2022 were included in this study. Patient demographics, diagnoses, antibiotic details, and prescriber specialty were collected, and descriptive statistics were used to report the data. Finally, using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, the subgroup analysis was considered to compare compliance rates between EM and ID specialists. Results: Of 770 patients with suspected infections, the ED prescribed antibiotics for 436 (56.6%). Levofloxacin was the most frequent ED antibiotic choice. ID specialists prescribed antibiotics less frequently for 157 patients (20.4%), favoring broad-spectrum combinations such as meropenem+vancomycin. In 38 cases (4.93%), ID specialists discontinued antibiotics initiated by the ED. This frequently involved discontinuing levofloxacin after a revised diagnosis of viral infection. There was low agreement between ED and ID specialists on antibiotic prescribing decisions (kappa: 0.095, P>0.05). Conclusion: Enhanced collaboration between EM and ID, including rapid diagnostics, tailored protocols, and targeted education, could optimize antibiotic prescribing in the ED. This has the potential to improve patient outcomes and combat antibiotic resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Published
2024-12-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.3552
Primary Topic
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic Prescribing Compliance Rates Between Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases Specialists in the Emergency Department

Alireza Javan, Seyedamir Tabibzadeh Dezfooli, Mahdi Rezai, Roxana Hessam et al.
Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
article

A Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic Prescribing Compliance Rates Between Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases Specialists in the Emergency Department

Alireza Javan, Seyedamir Tabibzadeh Dezfooli, Mahdi Rezai, Roxana Hessam, Maedeh Asna Aashari, Kourosh Javdani Esfehani, Pezhman Aghazadeh
article en

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic stewardship is crucial in the emergency department (ED) for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing antimicrobial resistance. Understanding differences in antibiotic prescribing practices between emergency medicine (EM) and infectious diseases (ID) specialists can inform targeted interventions to enhance antibiotic use in the ED setting. This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to compare antibiotic prescription compliance rates with established guidelines between EM and ID specialists within the ED. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Rasool Akram Hospital’s ED in 2022. Data from electronic health records and the prescription database were analyzed to compare antibiotic prescribing compliance rates between EM and ID specialists. Overall, 770 antibiotic prescriptions from the second half of 2022 were included in this study. Patient demographics, diagnoses, antibiotic details, and prescriber specialty were collected, and descriptive statistics were used to report the data. Finally, using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test, the subgroup analysis was considered to compare compliance rates between EM and ID specialists. Results: Of 770 patients with suspected infections, the ED prescribed antibiotics for 436 (56.6%). Levofloxacin was the most frequent ED antibiotic choice. ID specialists prescribed antibiotics less frequently for 157 patients (20.4%), favoring broad-spectrum combinations such as meropenem+vancomycin. In 38 cases (4.93%), ID specialists discontinued antibiotics initiated by the ED. This frequently involved discontinuing levofloxacin after a revised diagnosis of viral infection. There was low agreement between ED and ID specialists on antibiotic prescribing decisions (kappa: 0.095, P>0.05). Conclusion: Enhanced collaboration between EM and ID, including rapid diagnostics, tailored protocols, and targeted education, could optimize antibiotic prescribing in the ED. This has the potential to improve patient outcomes and combat antibiotic resistance.

Avicenna Journal of Clinical Microbiology and InfectionVol. 11(4)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Dubai Hospital (AE)
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Antibiotic Use and Resistance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.