Solving the paradox of Lean Management’s low success rate

This study investigates problems related to the high variance in the success rate of lean implementations, using a unique data set from a specific approach to implementing lean. We develop insights about how to effectively resolve the ‘Lean paradox’, namely that Lean concepts promise so much in theory yet deliver infrequently in practice. Our primary data of 268 Lean implementation initiatives illuminates the core elements of lean implementation success that explain this success variance. We present an in-depth case study of that specific method of lean implementation. Lean implementation success occurs when specific processes are followed, namely integration of job role and process analysis, comprehensive end-to-end deployment rather than spot-based problem solving, use of operator-based data about processes and waste, detailed level of data and change deployment focussed on waste reduction, and ongoing measurement and control of process changes. These ‘how’ factors provide both conceptual and practical insights for managers. JEL Classification: M11

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962241312725
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solving the paradox of Lean Management’s low success rate

Danny Samson, Zahra Seyedghorban, Scott Kelly, William Ho et al.
Australian Journal of Management
Quality and Supply Management
article

Solving the paradox of Lean Management’s low success rate

Danny Samson, Zahra Seyedghorban, Scott Kelly, William Ho, Diana Bevington
article en

Abstract

This study investigates problems related to the high variance in the success rate of lean implementations, using a unique data set from a specific approach to implementing lean. We develop insights about how to effectively resolve the ‘Lean paradox’, namely that Lean concepts promise so much in theory yet deliver infrequently in practice. Our primary data of 268 Lean implementation initiatives illuminates the core elements of lean implementation success that explain this success variance. We present an in-depth case study of that specific method of lean implementation. Lean implementation success occurs when specific processes are followed, namely integration of job role and process analysis, comprehensive end-to-end deployment rather than spot-based problem solving, use of operator-based data about processes and waste, detailed level of data and change deployment focussed on waste reduction, and ongoing measurement and control of process changes. These ‘how’ factors provide both conceptual and practical insights for managers. JEL Classification: M11

Australian Journal of ManagementVol. 51(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.