Improved Aftershock Forecasts Using Mainshock Information in the Framework of the ETAS Model

Abstract The Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model is the most widely used and powerful statistical model for aftershock forecasting. While the distribution of aftershocks around the mainshock is anisotropic, the spatial probability density function of the ETAS model is commonly assumed to be isotropic due to insufficient information. In addition, its parameter estimation can be highly biased due to catalog incompleteness after the mainshock. Thus, we extended the recently developed 2D temporal ETASI, which accounts for short‐term incompleteness, to 2D and 3D spatiotemporal ETASI, considering additional spatial occurrence probabilities in the framework of ETAS and ETASI to improve aftershock forecasting. We replaced the isotropic spatial kernel with anisotropic kernels estimated by a spatial probability map of stress scalars, including Coulomb stress changes on master fault orientation (MAS), Coulomb stress changes on variable mechanisms (VM), maximum shear (MS), and von Mises stress (VMS), and the nearest distance to the ruptured fault of the mainshock (R). The fit to six prominent mainshock‐aftershock sequences in California demonstrates that the ETASI model outperforms the standard ETAS model. Furthermore, positive information gains indicate that using stress calculations as additional input information can improve the parameter fit. This improvement is weaker in 3D, which is likely related to greater positional uncertainty in the depth domain. However, incorporating the probability map calculated as a function of the nearest distance to the mainshock rupture leads to the best performance in all model variants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jb030287
Citations
3
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improved Aftershock Forecasts Using Mainshock Information in the Framework of the ETAS Model

Gert Zöller, Behnam Maleki Asayesh, Sebastian Hainzl
3 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
article

Improved Aftershock Forecasts Using Mainshock Information in the Framework of the ETAS Model

Gert Zöller, Behnam Maleki Asayesh, Sebastian Hainzl
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model is the most widely used and powerful statistical model for aftershock forecasting. While the distribution of aftershocks around the mainshock is anisotropic, the spatial probability density function of the ETAS model is commonly assumed to be isotropic due to insufficient information. In addition, its parameter estimation can be highly biased due to catalog incompleteness after the mainshock. Thus, we extended the recently developed 2D temporal ETASI, which accounts for short‐term incompleteness, to 2D and 3D spatiotemporal ETASI, considering additional spatial occurrence probabilities in the framework of ETAS and ETASI to improve aftershock forecasting. We replaced the isotropic spatial kernel with anisotropic kernels estimated by a spatial probability map of stress scalars, including Coulomb stress changes on master fault orientation (MAS), Coulomb stress changes on variable mechanisms (VM), maximum shear (MS), and von Mises stress (VMS), and the nearest distance to the ruptured fault of the mainshock (R). The fit to six prominent mainshock‐aftershock sequences in California demonstrates that the ETASI model outperforms the standard ETAS model. Furthermore, positive information gains indicate that using stress calculations as additional input information can improve the parameter fit. This improvement is weaker in 3D, which is likely related to greater positional uncertainty in the depth domain. However, incorporating the probability map calculated as a function of the nearest distance to the mainshock rupture leads to the best performance in all model variants.

Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthVol. 130(2)
University of Potsdam (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
earthquake and tectonic studies
5.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.