Experiences of COVID-19 Patients With Person-Centred Care During Cohort Isolation: A Mixed-Method Study

Introduction Quality of care may have been compromised during the exceptionally hectic period of the COVID-19 waves, including isolation precautions. Aims Experiences with person-centred care and wellbeing of COVID-19 patients admitted to a cohort isolation nursing ward during the first pandemic wave were explored, including differences between the acute phase (March 2020) and semi-acute phase (April-June 2020). Methods A convergent parallel mixed-method design was used. Adult no post-ICU patients visiting the outpatient clinic for COVID-19 aftercare between May and September 2020 six to eight weeks after discharge from the COVID-19 hospital ward were asked to participate. Part 1 comprised Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) questionnaires (n=134) and part 2 semi-structured interviews (n=30). Thematic analysis was performed, and themes were linked to the domains of the person-centred care framework. Results Part 1: Median scores on all the questions of the PREM were high. The lowest scores on the PREM questionnaire were seen on shared decision-making during the acute phase. Part 2: In line with this, the interviews also indicated that the majority of patients had positive experiences regarding person-centred care and that patients felt a limited need for interaction in shared decision-making. Additionally, it was learned from the interviews that the domain care environment was affected most by the pandemic: the isolation precautions had an impact on patients' wellbeing, although they understood the necessity for isolation precautions to protect others. Patients felt lonely, missed physical contact with family and friends, and felt that contact with healthcare professionals was influenced by isolation clothes. Although some still felt isolated, the cohort department contributed to a feeling of engagement with other patients having the same illness. Conclusion Delivered care was positively experienced by patients despite the hectic outbreak period. Patients understood and adapted their preferences to the circumstances. However, patients' wellbeing was influenced by the circumstances in which care was received. To improve patients' wellbeing during isolation, recognisability of healthcare workers should be stimulated, visits from family and friends should be allowed, and no use of single-room isolation is advised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.78470
Citations
2
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of COVID-19 Patients With Person-Centred Care During Cohort Isolation: A Mixed-Method Study

Esther de Vries, Aukelien Scheffelaar, Andrea D. Rozema, Carolina J. P. W. Keijsers et al.
2 citations
Cureus
COVID-19 and Mental Health
4.61
article

Experiences of COVID-19 Patients With Person-Centred Care During Cohort Isolation: A Mixed-Method Study

Esther de Vries, Aukelien Scheffelaar, Andrea D. Rozema, Carolina J. P. W. Keijsers, Vera P. van Druten, Lenny M. W. Nahar-van Venrooij, Babette C van der Zwaard, Tessel H. G. Hendriksen, Dike van de Mheen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Introduction Quality of care may have been compromised during the exceptionally hectic period of the COVID-19 waves, including isolation precautions. Aims Experiences with person-centred care and wellbeing of COVID-19 patients admitted to a cohort isolation nursing ward during the first pandemic wave were explored, including differences between the acute phase (March 2020) and semi-acute phase (April-June 2020). Methods A convergent parallel mixed-method design was used. Adult no post-ICU patients visiting the outpatient clinic for COVID-19 aftercare between May and September 2020 six to eight weeks after discharge from the COVID-19 hospital ward were asked to participate. Part 1 comprised Patient Reported Experience Measure (PREM) questionnaires (n=134) and part 2 semi-structured interviews (n=30). Thematic analysis was performed, and themes were linked to the domains of the person-centred care framework. Results Part 1: Median scores on all the questions of the PREM were high. The lowest scores on the PREM questionnaire were seen on shared decision-making during the acute phase. Part 2: In line with this, the interviews also indicated that the majority of patients had positive experiences regarding person-centred care and that patients felt a limited need for interaction in shared decision-making. Additionally, it was learned from the interviews that the domain care environment was affected most by the pandemic: the isolation precautions had an impact on patients' wellbeing, although they understood the necessity for isolation precautions to protect others. Patients felt lonely, missed physical contact with family and friends, and felt that contact with healthcare professionals was influenced by isolation clothes. Although some still felt isolated, the cohort department contributed to a feeling of engagement with other patients having the same illness. Conclusion Delivered care was positively experienced by patients despite the hectic outbreak period. Patients understood and adapted their preferences to the circumstances. However, patients' wellbeing was influenced by the circumstances in which care was received. To improve patients' wellbeing during isolation, recognisability of healthcare workers should be stimulated, visits from family and friends should be allowed, and no use of single-room isolation is advised.

CureusVol. 17(2)
Tilburg University (NL), Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
4.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.