In-vitro and microdosimetric study of proton boron capture therapy and neutron capture enhanced proton therapy

<i>Objective.</i>The clinical advantage of proton therapy, compared to other types of irradiations, lies in its reduced dose to normal tissue. Still, proton therapy faces challenges of normal tissue toxicity and radioresistant tumors. To combat these challenges, proton boron capture therapy (PBCT) and neutron capture enhanced particle therapy (NCEPT) were proposed to introduce high-LET radiation in the target volume.<i>Approach</i>. In this work, we performed<i>in-vitro</i>experiments with a V79 cell line to validate PBCT and introduced a novel approach to use NCEPT in proton therapy. We quantified the effectiveness of PBCT and NCEPT with microdosimetric measurements, Monte-Carlo simulations and microdosimetric kinetic RBE model (MKM).<i>Main results</i>. No RBE increase was observed for PBCT. With the use of a tungsten spallation source, enough neutrons were generated in the incoming proton beam to measure significant neutron capture in the microdosimeter. However, no significant increase of RBE was detected when conventional<i>in vitro</i>protocol was followed. The resulting cell deactivation based RBE for NCEPT was found to be heavily dependent on which criteria was used to determine surviving colonies.<i>Significance</i>. PBCT and NCEPT are two proposed treatment modalities that may have the potential to expand the cases in which proton therapy can be beneficial. Understanding the scope of these treatment methods and developing measurement protocols to evaluate and understand their RBE impact are the first step to quantify their potential in clinical context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adb199
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Boron Compounds in Chemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-vitro and microdosimetric study of proton boron capture therapy and neutron capture enhanced proton therapy

Villads Lundsteen Jacobsen, James Vohradsky, Jacob Johansen, W. Sauerwein et al.
3 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Boron Compounds in Chemistry
4.08
article

In-vitro and microdosimetric study of proton boron capture therapy and neutron capture enhanced proton therapy

Villads Lundsteen Jacobsen, James Vohradsky, Jacob Johansen, W. Sauerwein, Morten Busk, Niels Bassler, Jonas Bønnelykke, Brita Singers Sørensen, Vladimir Pan, Anatoly Rosenfeld, Linh T. Tran, Anders Tobias Frederiksen, Cecilie Schmidt Herø
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>The clinical advantage of proton therapy, compared to other types of irradiations, lies in its reduced dose to normal tissue. Still, proton therapy faces challenges of normal tissue toxicity and radioresistant tumors. To combat these challenges, proton boron capture therapy (PBCT) and neutron capture enhanced particle therapy (NCEPT) were proposed to introduce high-LET radiation in the target volume.<i>Approach</i>. In this work, we performed<i>in-vitro</i>experiments with a V79 cell line to validate PBCT and introduced a novel approach to use NCEPT in proton therapy. We quantified the effectiveness of PBCT and NCEPT with microdosimetric measurements, Monte-Carlo simulations and microdosimetric kinetic RBE model (MKM).<i>Main results</i>. No RBE increase was observed for PBCT. With the use of a tungsten spallation source, enough neutrons were generated in the incoming proton beam to measure significant neutron capture in the microdosimeter. However, no significant increase of RBE was detected when conventional<i>in vitro</i>protocol was followed. The resulting cell deactivation based RBE for NCEPT was found to be heavily dependent on which criteria was used to determine surviving colonies.<i>Significance</i>. PBCT and NCEPT are two proposed treatment modalities that may have the potential to expand the cases in which proton therapy can be beneficial. Understanding the scope of these treatment methods and developing measurement protocols to evaluate and understand their RBE impact are the first step to quantify their potential in clinical context.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(5)
Aarhus University (DK), University of Wollongong (AU), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Muskelkranke (DE), Danish Pain Research Center (DK)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Boron Compounds in Chemistry
4.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.