Consumer involvement; the system says ‘No.’

The importance of authentic consumer engagement to shape decisions in health care is now well recognised. Both the National Health and Medical Research Council and Cancer Council conceptualise consumer involvement as a process that requires consumer capability and organisational capacity and emphasise that organisations should commit to acting on outcomes that have involved consumers. In this perspective piece, we share our experience of working with consumers to develop strategies that aimed to optimise referrals to an evidence-based and cost-effective intervention; a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Although we were successful at implementing some of the co-design strategies and were able to demonstrate an increase in referrals, we were surprised that many of the strategies, which were seemingly simple, could not be implemented due to bureaucratic barriers. Based on our experience, given their ability to navigate bureaucratic barriers within the system, future health researchers should consider actively recruiting senior hospital staff to be part of the co-design process from project inception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Health Review
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ah24207
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer involvement; the system says ‘No.’

Kylie Hill, Vinícius Cavalheri, Sarah Hug, Ben Horgan
Australian Health Review
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Consumer involvement; the system says ‘No.’

Kylie Hill, Vinícius Cavalheri, Sarah Hug, Ben Horgan
article en

Abstract

The importance of authentic consumer engagement to shape decisions in health care is now well recognised. Both the National Health and Medical Research Council and Cancer Council conceptualise consumer involvement as a process that requires consumer capability and organisational capacity and emphasise that organisations should commit to acting on outcomes that have involved consumers. In this perspective piece, we share our experience of working with consumers to develop strategies that aimed to optimise referrals to an evidence-based and cost-effective intervention; a pulmonary rehabilitation program. Although we were successful at implementing some of the co-design strategies and were able to demonstrate an increase in referrals, we were surprised that many of the strategies, which were seemingly simple, could not be implemented due to bureaucratic barriers. Based on our experience, given their ability to navigate bureaucratic barriers within the system, future health researchers should consider actively recruiting senior hospital staff to be part of the co-design process from project inception.

Australian Health ReviewVol. 49(1)
Curtin University (AU), Royal Perth Hospital (AU), North Metropolitan Health Service (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.