Unconventional appellatives in metalinguistic comments (based on NALR)

Our paper approaches the terms that function as “common names appellatives” encountered in metalinguistic comments. Used allocutively or not, these unconventional appellatives (sometimes codified and accepted by at least a part of the community members) are situated at the border of the nicknames, to which they relate due to their affective content, but do not express individualization by capturing uniqueness, as they designate “a species” or a personal category, being close to “group names appellatives”. Belonging to an area of interference between proper and common nouns, they individualize within a general class and, at the same time, like irony and nickname, constitute one of the pragmatic mechanisms that the speaker uses to criticize or ridicule various aspects that do not conform to the norms and the specific patterns of the traditional mentality, either related to the human body or to behaviors. Like nicknames, these unconventional appellatives belong to the collective imaginary and are the expression of the speaker’s free linguistic creativity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philologica Jassyensia
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60133/pj.2024.2.03
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unconventional appellatives in metalinguistic comments (based on NALR)

Rozalia Colciar
Philologica Jassyensia
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

Unconventional appellatives in metalinguistic comments (based on NALR)

Rozalia Colciar
article en

Abstract

Our paper approaches the terms that function as “common names appellatives” encountered in metalinguistic comments. Used allocutively or not, these unconventional appellatives (sometimes codified and accepted by at least a part of the community members) are situated at the border of the nicknames, to which they relate due to their affective content, but do not express individualization by capturing uniqueness, as they designate “a species” or a personal category, being close to “group names appellatives”. Belonging to an area of interference between proper and common nouns, they individualize within a general class and, at the same time, like irony and nickname, constitute one of the pragmatic mechanisms that the speaker uses to criticize or ridicule various aspects that do not conform to the norms and the specific patterns of the traditional mentality, either related to the human body or to behaviors. Like nicknames, these unconventional appellatives belong to the collective imaginary and are the expression of the speaker’s free linguistic creativity.

Philologica JassyensiaVol. 40(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.