The Hottest Neptunes Orbit Metal-rich Stars

Abstract The Neptune desert is no longer empty. A handful of close-in planets with masses between those of Neptune and Saturn have now been discovered, and their puzzling properties have inspired a number of interesting theories on the formation and evolution of desert-dwellers. While some studies suggest that Neptune desert planets form and evolve similarly to longer-period Neptunes, others argue that they are products of rare collisions between smaller planets, or that they are the exposed interiors of giant planets (i.e., “hot Jupiters gone wrong”). These origin stories make different predictions for the metallicities of Neptune desert host stars. In this paper, we use the homogeneous catalog of stellar metallicities from Gaia Data Release 3 to investigate the origins of Neptune desert dwellers. We find that planets in the Neptune desert orbit stars that are significantly more metal rich than the hosts of longer-period Neptunes ( p = 0.0016) and smaller planets ( p = 0.00014). In contrast, Neptune desert host star metallicities are statistically indistinguishable from those of hot Jupiter host stars ( p = 0.55). Therefore, we find it relatively unlikely that Neptune desert planets formed and evolved similarly to longer-period Neptunes, or that they resulted from collisions between smaller planets, at least without another metallicity-selective process involved. A more straightforward explanation for this result is that planets in the desert truly are the exposed interiors of larger planets. Atmospheric spectroscopy of Neptune desert worlds may therefore provide a rare glimpse into the interiors of giant exoplanets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ada143
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Hottest Neptunes Orbit Metal-rich Stars

Shreyas Vissapragada, Aida Behmard
12 citations
The Astronomical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
13.86
article

The Hottest Neptunes Orbit Metal-rich Stars

Shreyas Vissapragada, Aida Behmard
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Neptune desert is no longer empty. A handful of close-in planets with masses between those of Neptune and Saturn have now been discovered, and their puzzling properties have inspired a number of interesting theories on the formation and evolution of desert-dwellers. While some studies suggest that Neptune desert planets form and evolve similarly to longer-period Neptunes, others argue that they are products of rare collisions between smaller planets, or that they are the exposed interiors of giant planets (i.e., “hot Jupiters gone wrong”). These origin stories make different predictions for the metallicities of Neptune desert host stars. In this paper, we use the homogeneous catalog of stellar metallicities from Gaia Data Release 3 to investigate the origins of Neptune desert dwellers. We find that planets in the Neptune desert orbit stars that are significantly more metal rich than the hosts of longer-period Neptunes ( p = 0.0016) and smaller planets ( p = 0.00014). In contrast, Neptune desert host star metallicities are statistically indistinguishable from those of hot Jupiter host stars ( p = 0.55). Therefore, we find it relatively unlikely that Neptune desert planets formed and evolved similarly to longer-period Neptunes, or that they resulted from collisions between smaller planets, at least without another metallicity-selective process involved. A more straightforward explanation for this result is that planets in the desert truly are the exposed interiors of larger planets. Atmospheric spectroscopy of Neptune desert worlds may therefore provide a rare glimpse into the interiors of giant exoplanets.

The Astronomical JournalVol. 169(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
13.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.