THE SUSPENSION CLAUSE, AND LINCOLN’S POSSIBLE CONSTITUTIONAL ABROGATION

This review is a critical analysis of the caselaw of Habeas Corpus in the United States, as applied to U.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s authorization of the suspension of Habeas Corpus by U.S. Army command staff during the American Civil War. The constitutional challenges to the authority of the chief executive to exercise suspension of Habeas Corpus are outlined and the motivations of the chief executive to nonetheless exercise an authority that was at best unclear at the time are identified. This manuscript concludes that the weight of textual interpretation of the U.S. Constitution as well as precedent were against such an exercise of power by the President, setting a precedent for executive authority that has gone largely unresolved to the modern day

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Legal Studies ( IJOLS )
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.9835
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE SUSPENSION CLAUSE, AND LINCOLN’S POSSIBLE CONSTITUTIONAL ABROGATION

Michael J. Davis
International Journal of Legal Studies ( IJOLS )
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

THE SUSPENSION CLAUSE, AND LINCOLN’S POSSIBLE CONSTITUTIONAL ABROGATION

Michael J. Davis
article en

Abstract

This review is a critical analysis of the caselaw of Habeas Corpus in the United States, as applied to U.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s authorization of the suspension of Habeas Corpus by U.S. Army command staff during the American Civil War. The constitutional challenges to the authority of the chief executive to exercise suspension of Habeas Corpus are outlined and the motivations of the chief executive to nonetheless exercise an authority that was at best unclear at the time are identified. This manuscript concludes that the weight of textual interpretation of the U.S. Constitution as well as precedent were against such an exercise of power by the President, setting a precedent for executive authority that has gone largely unresolved to the modern day

International Journal of Legal Studies ( IJOLS )Vol. 18(2)
Southeastern Oklahoma State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE SUSPENSION CLAUSE, AND LINCOLN’S POSSIBLE CONSTITUTIONAL ABROGATION — Michael J. Davis · International Journal of Legal Studies ( IJOLS ) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS