Characterisation of the CRISPR-Cas systems in <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> from commercial broiler farm environments and its association with antimicrobial resistance

1. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated proteins (Cas) systems have been highlighted for their potential applications in controlling the spread of mobile genetic elements, including antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. This study investigated the characteristics of CRISPR-Cas systems in <i>E. faecalis</i> from commercial broiler farms and assessed the impact of these systems on AMR.2. All <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates contained CRISPR2, and CRISPR1-Cas and CRISPR3-Cas were identified in 84 (56.4%) and 144 (96.6%) isolates. A combination of CRISPR2 and CRISPR3-Cas and a combination of CRISPR1-Cas, CRISPR2 and CRISPR3-Cas were each identified in 27 (96.4%) farms.3. There were significant differences between CRISPR-Cas systems for phenotypic AMR: CRISPR1-Cas and CRISPR3-Cas. The <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates without CRISPR1-Cas showed higher resistance to most antimicrobials and had a higher prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) than those with CRISPR1-Cas. However, the resistance rate against most antimicrobials and the prevalence of MDR did not differ significantly depending on the presence or absence of CRISPR3-Cas.4. The <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates without CRISPR1-Cas harboured higher levels of all AMR genes, except for <i>tetL</i>, than those with CRISPR1-Cas. However, the <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates with CRISPR3-Cas showed a significant lower prevalence of <i>tetL</i> gene and a significantly higher prevalence of <i>fexA</i> and <i>poxtA</i> genes.5. In the distribution of <i>rep</i> families, the <i>rep</i><sub>9</sub> family was predominant, followed by <i>rep</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>rep</i><sub>7</sub>, <i>rep</i><sub>2</sub> and <i>rep</i><sub>8</sub> families. Only prevalence of the <i>rep</i><sub>7</sub> family was significantly higher in the <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates without CRISPR1-Cas (15.4%) than in those with CRISPR1-Cas (0%).6. This study is the first report on the characteristics of CRISPR-Cas systems in <i>E. faecalis</i> isolated from commercial broiler farm environments, and the results supported the hypothesis that the development of antimicrobial strategies requires an understanding of the distinctive capabilities between CRISPR1-Cas and CRISPR3-Cas and their underlying resistance mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Poultry Science
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2025.2451268
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterisation of the CRISPR-Cas systems in Enterococcus faecalis from commercial broiler farm environments and its association with antimicrobial resistance

MB Kim, Young Ju Lee
1 citations
British Poultry Science
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.81
article

Characterisation of the CRISPR-Cas systems in Enterococcus faecalis from commercial broiler farm environments and its association with antimicrobial resistance

MB Kim, Young Ju Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

1. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated proteins (Cas) systems have been highlighted for their potential applications in controlling the spread of mobile genetic elements, including antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. This study investigated the characteristics of CRISPR-Cas systems in <i>E. faecalis</i> from commercial broiler farms and assessed the impact of these systems on AMR.2. All <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates contained CRISPR2, and CRISPR1-Cas and CRISPR3-Cas were identified in 84 (56.4%) and 144 (96.6%) isolates. A combination of CRISPR2 and CRISPR3-Cas and a combination of CRISPR1-Cas, CRISPR2 and CRISPR3-Cas were each identified in 27 (96.4%) farms.3. There were significant differences between CRISPR-Cas systems for phenotypic AMR: CRISPR1-Cas and CRISPR3-Cas. The <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates without CRISPR1-Cas showed higher resistance to most antimicrobials and had a higher prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR) than those with CRISPR1-Cas. However, the resistance rate against most antimicrobials and the prevalence of MDR did not differ significantly depending on the presence or absence of CRISPR3-Cas.4. The <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates without CRISPR1-Cas harboured higher levels of all AMR genes, except for <i>tetL</i>, than those with CRISPR1-Cas. However, the <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates with CRISPR3-Cas showed a significant lower prevalence of <i>tetL</i> gene and a significantly higher prevalence of <i>fexA</i> and <i>poxtA</i> genes.5. In the distribution of <i>rep</i> families, the <i>rep</i><sub>9</sub> family was predominant, followed by <i>rep</i><sub>1</sub>, <i>rep</i><sub>7</sub>, <i>rep</i><sub>2</sub> and <i>rep</i><sub>8</sub> families. Only prevalence of the <i>rep</i><sub>7</sub> family was significantly higher in the <i>E. faecalis</i> isolates without CRISPR1-Cas (15.4%) than in those with CRISPR1-Cas (0%).6. This study is the first report on the characteristics of CRISPR-Cas systems in <i>E. faecalis</i> isolated from commercial broiler farm environments, and the results supported the hypothesis that the development of antimicrobial strategies requires an understanding of the distinctive capabilities between CRISPR1-Cas and CRISPR3-Cas and their underlying resistance mechanisms.

British Poultry ScienceVol. 66(4)
Kyungpook National University (KR)
Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.