Comparison evaluation of bacterial DNA extraction methods for improved molecular diagnostic accuracy of sepsis-causing pathogens in clinical whole blood samples

Sepsis, a leading cause of mortality, requires rapid and accurate pathogen identification to ensure effective treatment. Current diagnostic methods such as blood cultures are time-consuming, whereas molecular diagnostic techniques represent a promising alternative for faster pathogen detection. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate different DNA extraction methods for the improved detection of infectious pathogens in the bloodstream. Specifically, we compared one column-based DNA extraction method (QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit) with two magnetic bead-based DNA extraction methods (K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system). Real-time PCR was performed using specific primers to assess the efficiency of each method. The K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system exhibited higher accuracy rates of 77.5% (22/40) and 76.5% (21/40), respectively, compared to the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, which had an accuracy rate 65.0% (12/40) for Escherichia coli detection, whereas the GraBon™ system demonstrated higher accuracy rate of 77.5% (22/40) than the other two methods, which had an accuracy rates of 67.5% (14/40) for Staphylococcus aureus detection. All methods displayed high specificity for negative samples (100%). These findings highlight the superior performance of magnetic bead-based methods, particularly when automated, for extracting bacterial DNA from whole blood samples. Such methods may enable the more rapid and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87225-y
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison evaluation of bacterial DNA extraction methods for improved molecular diagnostic accuracy of sepsis-causing pathogens in clinical whole blood samples

Yu‐Hee Kim, B. K. Na, Jinyeop Lee, Hae‐Sun Chung et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
6.59
article

Comparison evaluation of bacterial DNA extraction methods for improved molecular diagnostic accuracy of sepsis-causing pathogens in clinical whole blood samples

Yu‐Hee Kim, B. K. Na, Jinyeop Lee, Hae‐Sun Chung, Jimin Jang, Eunseon Park, Junghun Park, Sojin Park
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Sepsis, a leading cause of mortality, requires rapid and accurate pathogen identification to ensure effective treatment. Current diagnostic methods such as blood cultures are time-consuming, whereas molecular diagnostic techniques represent a promising alternative for faster pathogen detection. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate different DNA extraction methods for the improved detection of infectious pathogens in the bloodstream. Specifically, we compared one column-based DNA extraction method (QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit) with two magnetic bead-based DNA extraction methods (K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system). Real-time PCR was performed using specific primers to assess the efficiency of each method. The K-SL DNA Extraction Kit and GraBon™ system exhibited higher accuracy rates of 77.5% (22/40) and 76.5% (21/40), respectively, compared to the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit, which had an accuracy rate 65.0% (12/40) for Escherichia coli detection, whereas the GraBon™ system demonstrated higher accuracy rate of 77.5% (22/40) than the other two methods, which had an accuracy rates of 67.5% (14/40) for Staphylococcus aureus detection. All methods displayed high specificity for negative samples (100%). These findings highlight the superior performance of magnetic bead-based methods, particularly when automated, for extracting bacterial DNA from whole blood samples. Such methods may enable the more rapid and accurate diagnosis of bloodstream infections, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Ewha Womans University (KR), King Institute of Preventive Medicine and Research (IN), Nongwoo Bio (South Korea) (KR), Ewha Womans University Medical Center (KR)
Ministry of SMEs and Startups
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
6.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.