Memory‐guided perception is shaped by dynamic two‐stage theta‐ and alpha‐mediated retrieval

How does memory influence auditory perception, and what are the underlying mechanisms that drive these interactions? Most empirical studies on the neural correlates of memory-guided perception have used static visual tasks, resulting in a bias in the literature that contrasts with recent research highlighting the dynamic nature of memory retrieval. Here, we used electroencephalography to track the retrieval of auditory associative memories in a cue-target paradigm. Participants (N = 64) listened to real-world soundscapes that were either predictive of an upcoming target tone or nonpredictive. Three key results emerged. First, targets were detected faster when embedded in predictive than in nonpredictive soundscapes (memory-guided perceptual benefit). Second, changes in theta and alpha power differentiated soundscape contexts that were predictive from nonpredictive contexts at two distinct temporal intervals from soundscape onset (early-950 ms peak for theta and alpha, and late-1650 ms peak for alpha only). Third, early theta activity in the left anterior temporal lobe was correlated with memory-guided perceptual benefits. Together, these findings underscore the role of distinct neural processes at different time points during associative retrieval. By emphasizing temporal sensitivity and by isolating cue-related activity, we reveal a two-stage retrieval mechanism that advances our understanding of how memory influences auditory perception.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15287
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Memory‐guided perception is shaped by dynamic two‐stage theta‐ and alpha‐mediated retrieval

Claude Alain, Manda Fischer, Morris Moscovitch
1 citations
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
1.43
article

Memory‐guided perception is shaped by dynamic two‐stage theta‐ and alpha‐mediated retrieval

Claude Alain, Manda Fischer, Morris Moscovitch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

How does memory influence auditory perception, and what are the underlying mechanisms that drive these interactions? Most empirical studies on the neural correlates of memory-guided perception have used static visual tasks, resulting in a bias in the literature that contrasts with recent research highlighting the dynamic nature of memory retrieval. Here, we used electroencephalography to track the retrieval of auditory associative memories in a cue-target paradigm. Participants (N = 64) listened to real-world soundscapes that were either predictive of an upcoming target tone or nonpredictive. Three key results emerged. First, targets were detected faster when embedded in predictive than in nonpredictive soundscapes (memory-guided perceptual benefit). Second, changes in theta and alpha power differentiated soundscape contexts that were predictive from nonpredictive contexts at two distinct temporal intervals from soundscape onset (early-950 ms peak for theta and alpha, and late-1650 ms peak for alpha only). Third, early theta activity in the left anterior temporal lobe was correlated with memory-guided perceptual benefits. Together, these findings underscore the role of distinct neural processes at different time points during associative retrieval. By emphasizing temporal sensitivity and by isolating cue-related activity, we reveal a two-stage retrieval mechanism that advances our understanding of how memory influences auditory perception.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 1544(1)
Western University (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Baycrest Hospital (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.