The Impact of Perception of the Criminal Justice System on the Acceptance of Vigilantism

Recent attention has focused on private sanctions, where individuals or organizations impose penalties as alternatives to the criminal justice system due to perceived inefficiency or unfairness. This study examines how perceptions of the criminal justice system influence acceptance of private sanctions. Data were collected from a nationwide online survey of 1,000 adults, analyzed using hierarchical regression. Model 1 identified “age” and “education level” as significant factors, while Model 2 found “trust in criminal justice agencies” to be the primary factor. Younger and less-educated individuals were more accepting of private sanctions, as were those with lower trust in institutions such as courts, police, and prosecutors. Enhancing public trust and perceptions of fairness within the criminal justice system is essential to address the growing favorability toward private sanctions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Association of Criminal Psychology
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25277/kcpr.2024.20.4.53
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Perception of the Criminal Justice System on the Acceptance of Vigilantism

Yeon Soo Kim, Nam Gyu Kim
Korean Association of Criminal Psychology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Impact of Perception of the Criminal Justice System on the Acceptance of Vigilantism

Yeon Soo Kim, Nam Gyu Kim
article en

Abstract

Recent attention has focused on private sanctions, where individuals or organizations impose penalties as alternatives to the criminal justice system due to perceived inefficiency or unfairness. This study examines how perceptions of the criminal justice system influence acceptance of private sanctions. Data were collected from a nationwide online survey of 1,000 adults, analyzed using hierarchical regression. Model 1 identified “age” and “education level” as significant factors, while Model 2 found “trust in criminal justice agencies” to be the primary factor. Younger and less-educated individuals were more accepting of private sanctions, as were those with lower trust in institutions such as courts, police, and prosecutors. Enhancing public trust and perceptions of fairness within the criminal justice system is essential to address the growing favorability toward private sanctions.

Korean Association of Criminal PsychologyVol. 20(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.